Pilot-evaluation of an interprofessional training on people with flight and migration experience and symptoms of post-traumatic stress disorder

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Observational

Source

DRKS

Registry ID

DRKS00016534

Enrollment

Registered

2019-04-30

Start date

2019-01-08

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2025-04-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Satisfaction with the training and learning progress of the participants

Interventions

Group 1: Participants of the training are asked about their satisfaction with the further training after the continuing education. Participants of the training are asked about their knowledge of post-

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

All

Age

18 Years to 65 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: - Knowledge of German language in speaking and writing

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: - Incomplete participation in the training

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
The primary objective is the satisfaction of the participants. Participants' satisfaction with continuing education is measured by using the affective-behavioral-cognitive-satisfaction questionnaire (ABC-Sat, Meng et al., 2018). The ABC-Sat is handed out to the participants at the end of the training. Satisfaction with training is measured in the ABC-Sat with 11 items, each evaluated on a five-level scale. The 11 items are divided into three subscales, each of which measures one of the three dimensions of satisfaction (affective, behavioral, cognitive). The results range from zero (absolute dissatisfaction) to 44 points (highest satisfaction). The scales fulfil the conditions of a Likert scale and the sum value can be treated as quasi-metric (Völkl & Korb, 2018).	—

Measure

Time frame

The primary objective is the satisfaction of the participants. Participants' satisfaction with continuing education is measured by using the affective-behavioral-cognitive-satisfaction questionnaire (ABC-Sat, Meng et al., 2018). The ABC-Sat is handed out to the participants at the end of the training. Satisfaction with training is measured in the ABC-Sat with 11 items, each evaluated on a five-level scale. The 11 items are divided into three subscales, each of which measures one of the three dimensions of satisfaction (affective, behavioral, cognitive). The results range from zero (absolute dissatisfaction) to 44 points (highest satisfaction). The scales fulfil the conditions of a Likert scale and the sum value can be treated as quasi-metric (Völkl & Korb, 2018).

—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
The secondary objective is to change the participants' knowledge from before to after the training. The knowledge is assessed by means of a questionnaire developed specifically for the particular question. The questionnaire comprises nine questions on post-traumatic stress disorder and flight and migration (contents of the training). The questionnaire is designed as a multiple-choice test, each question has four answer options, the number of correct and incorrect answers is equal. A point is given for each correct answer and a point is subtracted for each incorrect answer. The ratio of correct to incorrect answers and the way points are awarded are ways of controlling the proportion of guessed answers (Reischmann, 2003; Uemminghaus, 2009). The aim is to ensure that a positive difference from pre- to post-measurement does not result exclusively from a better rate of hits in guessing. Pre- and post-measurement take place directly before and directly after the training.	—

Measure

Time frame

The secondary objective is to change the participants' knowledge from before to after the training. The knowledge is assessed by means of a questionnaire developed specifically for the particular question. The questionnaire comprises nine questions on post-traumatic stress disorder and flight and migration (contents of the training). The questionnaire is designed as a multiple-choice test, each question has four answer options, the number of correct and incorrect answers is equal. A point is given for each correct answer and a point is subtracted for each incorrect answer. The ratio of correct to incorrect answers and the way points are awarded are ways of controlling the proportion of guessed answers (Reischmann, 2003; Uemminghaus, 2009). The aim is to ensure that a positive difference from pre- to post-measurement does not result exclusively from a better rate of hits in guessing. Pre- and post-measurement take place directly before and directly after the training.

—

Countries

Germany

Contacts

Public ContactMatthias Windeisen

Institut für Pflegewissenschaft, Medizinische Fakultät, Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg

matthias.windeisen@merkur.uni-freiburg.de+49761-270-64820

Outcome results

None listed

Source: DRKS (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026