Does the design of the cervical disc prothesis and the ancoring mechanism have an influence on the clincial results or the incidence of heterotopic ossifications

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Observational

Source

DRKS

Registry ID

DRKS00015479

Enrollment

Registered

2018-10-08

Start date

2018-10-05

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2025-04-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

M42.12 M50.1

Interventions

Group 1: Since 2003, artificial intervertebral discs have been used for various pathologies of the cervical spine in our spine center. In the course of time some design changes have been made, mainly

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

All

Age

18 Years to 99 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Implantation of a total cervical disc replacement ProDisc C or ProDisc vivo 1-3 segments

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: no matched pair found

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Rate of heterotopic ossifications at the 2 years follow up	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
clinical results (VAS, NDI, implant related complications)	—

Countries

Germany

Contacts

Public ContactChristoph Mehren

Schön Klinik München Harlaching

cmehren@schoen-kliniken.de089762110

Outcome results

None listed

Source: DRKS (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026