Skip to content

Is there a dose-response relationship of robotic-assisted therapy in motor rehabilitation of the upper extremity after stroke? A Pilot Study with the Armeo®Spring.

Is there a dose-response relationship of robotic-assisted therapy in motor rehabilitation of the upper extremity after stroke? A Pilot Study with the Armeo®Spring.

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
DRKS
Registry ID
DRKS00015083
Enrollment
30
Registered
2018-09-04
Start date
2017-04-27
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-04-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

I60 I61 I62 I63 I64

Interventions

Group 1: In addition to conventional rehabilitative therapy, the intervention group receives a 45-minute training session with the Armeo®Spring 5 times a week for three weeks. Group 2: Patients in the

Sponsors

Lurija Institut Kliniken Schmieder Allensbach
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to No maximum

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Ability to give informed consent for the participation in the study 2. Sufficient understanding of instructions 3. Ability to operate the Armeo®Spring 4. first cerebrovascular incident leading to hemiplegia, subacute phase < 3 months following incident 5. Movement of the arm possible if the weight of the arm is carried by a support (at least strength level 2 for shoulderjoint movement) 6. At least 18 years of age

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. prior history of neurological or psychiatric conditions 2. cognitive impairements that hinder the understanding of the study (e.g. receptive (Wernicke) aphasia, global aphasia, dementia) 3. participants demonstrating insufficient compliance 4. severe apraxia 5. severe neglect-relevant pain symptoms of the affected side of the body (>3 on the visual analoge scale [scale ranging from 0 to 10] 6. epilepsy or previous history of epileptic episodes 7. pregnancy 8. Presence of a [cardiac] pacemaker, implanted medical, electromedical or other devices 9. Presence of metallic and conductive inclusions or implants 10. Participants have tattoos in the head- or neckregions, nicotin patches or cosmetic manipulations of the eyelids (permanent make-up) 11. Participants suffering from claustrophobia 12. Participants with metalic contraceptives such as a contraceptive coil (possibly comprised of copper)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Fugl-Meyer Assessment in upper limb (at baseline; Post-test after three weeks; Follow-up after another two weeks).

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Transcranial magnetic stimulation (single stimuli, cortical silent period (cSP) at stimulation intensity 120% above the individual threshold at baseline and after 3 weeks); Magnetic Resonance Imaging / Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (resting state fMRI, structural MRI, diffusion tensor imaging at baseline and after 3 weeks).

Countries

Germany

Contacts

Public ContactAida Sehle

Lurija Institut Kliniken Schmieder Allensbach

a.sehle@kliniken-schmiede.de07533 808-1318

Outcome results

None listed

Source: DRKS (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 24, 2026