Skip to content

Between self-care and self-optimization: The impact of the internet and social media on the identity of mentally burdened and unburdened people in the different generations

Between self-care and self-optimization: The impact of the internet and social media on the identity of mentally burdened and unburdened people in the different generations - SelfOpt

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
DRKS
Registry ID
DRKS00014815
Enrollment
60
Registered
2018-08-09
Start date
2018-05-29
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-04-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

F32.0 F32.1 F33 F38 F40 F41 F42 F43

Interventions

Group 1: Participants of the generation Y (1981-2000) Group 2: Participants of the generation X (1966-1980) Group 3: Participants of the generation Baby Boomers (1950-1965)

Sponsors

Universitätsklinikum HeidelbergKlinik für Allgemeine Innere Medizin und Psychosomatik (Innere II)
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to 65 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Subjects of the age groups - 1950-1965 - 1966-1980 - 1981-2000 Mentally burdened and unburdened test persons. Unburdened = no diagnosis of a mental illness within the last 3 years Burdened = mild to moderate depressive episode (F32.0 or F32.1), recurrent depression (F33) or other mood disorders (F38), phobic disorders (F40), other anxiety disorders (F41), obsessive compulsive disorder (F42) Responses to severe stress and adjustment disorders (F43)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Own wish, suicidality, severe depressive episode (F32.2)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
The following relationsships will be examined: • Relationship between generation and the extent of self-optimization • Connection of self-optimization and the extent of mental stress • Connections between self-optimization and technology readiness • Relationships between self-optimization and the extent of self-efficacy expectations • Connections between self-optimization and personality factors The study will take place in two stages: First, up to 5 focus groups will be formed, each with 5-7 subjects from the three cohorts discussing the topics outlined. This phase is part of method development. Therefore, in this step only mentally unburdened subjects are questioned. This method is used to get to know the relevance system of the test persons. On the basis of the evaluation, relevant content categories for the later qualitative study are worked out. The categories are an integral part of the guideline to be developed in the second stage. On this basis, up to 60 subjects from the three cohorts are questioned quantitatively and qualitatively in the survey phase, and a self-observation regarding their media use over a period of two days is requested. The subjects may but need not have participated in the focus groups. Instruments The questions are examined by a mixed-method design by means of a cross-sectional study. Three standardized instruments provide quantitative data: The short scale for recording technical readiness is intended to measure the extent to which technology is used and accepted. The questionnaire on the generalized self-efficacy expectation (summary) examines to what extent the expectation exists to actively influence one's own well-being. The Big Five Inventory (BFI-10) measures personality factors. The HADS-D (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale) allows a self-assessment of the current mental stress. In the next step, the subjects are interviewed in a semi-standardized guide interview about their life story and their level of self-attention. F

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
If there is a connection between the generation and the extent of self-optimization, do those affected feel more positive in the sense of self-care or as pressure in the sense of self-optimization? In which areas does this take place (body, psyche, social environment, others)? Is there a connection between technological readiness and age? To what extent are wearable devices used for self-tracking, etc.?

Countries

Germany

Contacts

Public ContactGwendolyn Mayer

Universitätsklinikum HeidelbergKlinik für Allgemeine Innere Medizin und Psychosomatik (Innere II)

gwendolyn.mayer@med.uni-heidelberg.de06221/56-35685

Outcome results

None listed

Source: DRKS (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026