Skip to content

Patient feedback after buccal infiltration with a computer assisted method (The Wand/ STA) in comparison to a conventional syringe at tooth neck defects in private practice

Patient feedback after buccal infiltration with a computer assisted method (The Wand/ STA) in comparison to a conventional syringe at tooth neck defects in private practice

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
DRKS
Registry ID
DRKS00014765
Enrollment
20
Registered
2018-05-29
Start date
2018-06-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-04-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

tooth neck defects

Interventions

Group 1: Conventional buccal infiltration is used to anesthetise teeth/ region before applying a tooth neck filling. The utilised medicament is always 1.5 ml of Aritcain 4% with an epinephrin concentr

Sponsors

Privatpraxis
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
20 Years to No maximum

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: patient is contractually capable, at least two buccal lesions in different anesthesia regions, buccal anesthesia is indicated, no previous experience with the Wand/ STA system was expected and no contraindications for local anesthesia, signed informed consent

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: contraindication due to general health issues medicament related altered pain perception

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
The primary outcome is the patient`s estimation of the pain after application of the anesthesia. This perception is to be indicatied on a visual analogue scale just after the anesthesia.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
The following secondary outcomes are inverstigated: 1. Visual impression of the anesthesia 1. Puncture of the respective method 3. Pain perception dunring treatment under anesthesia 4. mode of absence of numbness The patient can assess the the above mentioned parameters on a visual analogue scale. Afterwards the patient is asked to decide between the two methods, which one is the preferred one or indifferent. After reflextion time (endpoint of anesthesia) and observation of absence of numbness the patient finally has to decide between the two anesthetic methods or indifferent.

Countries

Switzerland

Contacts

Public ContactSohar Flisfisch

Privatpraxis

Sohar_F@yahoo.com004161 2725043

Outcome results

None listed

Source: DRKS (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026