Clinical comparison of electroplated double crown-retained prostheses: all-ceramic vs. cobalt-chromium alloy primary crowns

Clinical comparison of electroplated double crown-retained prostheses: all-ceramic vs. cobalt-chromium alloy primary crowns - Procera

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Interventional

Source

DRKS

Registry ID

DRKS00014356

Enrollment

Registered

2018-03-29

Start date

2008-10-08

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2025-04-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

missing teeth

Interventions

Group 1: In this study, electroplating is used to produce the secondary crowns. The electroplated copings are glued intraorally into the denture framework to optimize the fit. In the intervention arm

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

All

Age

18 Years to No maximum

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Need for a double crown-retained prosthesis with 2-6 abutments

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: wish for implants

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Prosthesis survival and abutment survival after 5 years by clinical examination	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
Complications after 5 years (clinical examination), Oral health-related quality of life (OHIP-49 questionnaire)	—

Countries

Germany

Contacts

Public ContactThomas Stober

Uniklinik Heidelberg

sebastian.schwindling@med.uni-heidelberg.de06221 56 6040

Outcome results

None listed

Source: DRKS (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026