Skip to content

The relation between addiction, working memory, future thinking and delay discounting

The relation between addiction, working memory, future thinking and delay discounting

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
DRKS
Registry ID
DRKS00014062
Enrollment
40
Registered
2018-03-20
Start date
2018-04-14
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-04-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

F10.2 F11.2 F13.2 F14.2 F15.2 F16.2 F18.2 F19.2

Interventions

Group 1: This basic research study (psychology) is non-experimental and non-invasive. Aim of the study: Different questionnaires and tests will be used to gain information regarding the relation betwe
Beck, Steer & Brown, 1996) to measure depressive symptoms. - A computerized 2-back task (Jaeggi, Buschkuehl, Perrig, & Meier, 2010) to measure the working memory capacity. - The Autobiographical Me
Kleim, Graham, Fihosy, Stott & Ehlers, 2014) to measure future thinking specificity. Participants will be asked to describe a future event related to six positive and six negative cue words. - The Mo
Kirby, Petry & Bickel, 1999) to measure individual delay discounting rates. - A demographic questionnaire The AMT-f will be administered by the researcher (in person). All other tests will be done a
Beck, Steer & Brown, 1996) to measure depressive symptoms. - A computerized 2-back task (Jaeggi, Buschkuehl, Perrig, & Meier, 2010) t

Sponsors

Radboud University Nijmegen: Sozialwissenschaftliche Fakultät/ Faculty of Social Sciences
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to 65 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: There are 2 groups (1. Addiction group; 2. Control group). Each group consists of 20 participants (male/female, between 18 and 65 years). Participants of the addiction group must be diagnosed with an addiction disorder/substance dependence (F10.2, F11.2, F13.2, F14.2, F15.2, F16.2, F18.2, F19.2). Furthermore, they must be able to speak German and have to be in treatment at the LVR-Klinik Bonn. Participants of the control group must speak German or Dutch and have to be students of the Radboud University Nijmegen.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: - Pure cannabis addiction (ICD 10: F12.2) will be excluded, since no long-term WM impairment was found for cannabis (Crean, Crane & Mason, 2011). - Less than 30 days abstinent: Detoxification can impair cognitive functioning for a couple of days and weeks. To minimize the acute influences of detoxification on cognitive performance, participants of the addiction group must be abstinent for at least 30 days.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
This basic research study (psychology) is non-experimental and non-invasive. The data of each participant will be collected within one individual session (no follow-ups). The following variables will be measured: Mood: The influence of mood on FTS has been found in different studies. To be able to control for this influence, the Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II; Beck, Steer & Brown, 1996) will be administered to all participants. This self-report test is designed to measure the intensity of depressive symptoms and consists of 21 items (Likert scale 0-3). Working memory capacity: To measure WM capacity, a computerized 2-back task (Jaeggi, Buschkuehl, Perrig, & Meier, 2010) will be used. A sequence of letters will be presented on a screen one-by-one for a short interval. Participants must decide whether the displayed letter is the same as the letter two trails before. Accuracy serve as measures of performance. Future thinking specificity (FTS): To measure in the addiction group, the Autobiographical Memory Test Future (AMT-f; Kleim, Graham, Fihosy, Stott & Ehlers, 2014) will be used. Participants will be asked to describe a future event related to six positive and six negative cue words. Responses will be audio-recorded and transcribed for coding purposes. The Sentence Completion for Events of the Future Test (SCEFT; Raes, Hermans, Williams & Eelen, 2009) will be used to assess the FTS in the control group. This is done, since the SCEFT is more sensitive in student-sample (Raes et al., 2007). Moreover it is suitable for the online data collection, since the presence of a researcher is not required. It consists of 11 sentence stems (e.g. ‘When I look forward to…’). Participants will be asked to complete the sentences by generating possible future events. Responses of both tests are rated regarding their specificity. Delay discounting: The Monetary-Choice Questionnaire (MCQ; Kirby, Petry & Bickel, 1999) will be used to measure participant`s delay discount

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
No additional measurements or observations will be done. No follow-ups.

Countries

Germany, Netherlands

Contacts

Public ContactThomas Langkau

Radboud University Nijmegen: Sozialwissenschaftliche Fakultät/Faculty of Social Sciences

thomas.langkau@student.ru.nl+4915734699909

Outcome results

None listed

Source: DRKS (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026