Quality assurance study for vascular surgical patient information

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Observational

Source

DRKS

Registry ID

DRKS00014050

Enrollment

200

Registered

2018-02-19

Start date

2014-12-22

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2025-10-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

I70.21 I70.22 I70.23 I70.24 I74.3

Interventions

Group 1: 1st phase: - Informed consent to the study immediately after the surgical information - questionnaire 1 to fill in after the discussion, 1 day before the procedure, usually on the day of admi

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

All

Age

18 Years to No maximum

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patients with elective surgery: Femoral Fork Thrombendarterectomy (TEA) in arterial obstructive disease (AOD), - aortic intervention (minimally invasive or open-surgical) in infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm, - Digital Subtraction Angiography (DSA) due to an AOD

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: - non-competent patients (care), - refusal of participation, - OP on the day of admission, - outpatient procedures, - emergency or urgent surgery

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Examination of the postoperative quality of life as a target variable depending on the actual and the expected (desired by the patient) postoperative course with Quality of life questionnaire at the first outpatient visit	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
1. Increasing patient satisfaction and "perceived" safety: Examination of patient memory selectivity for possible complications, potential surgical success and failure, depending on the actual postoperative 30-day and long-term course, e.g. Overvaluation of the OP's chances, neglecting the risks, postoperative disappointment etc. 2. Investigation of further influencing factors on the evaluation of the benefit-risk relation, e.g. OP (2 different OPs for comparison) of comorbidities, sex and age. 3. Is it possible to arrange the surgical discussion so that the postoperative mean patient satisfaction and quality of life in the case of a complicated postoperative course is better than before?	—

Measure

Time frame

1. Increasing patient satisfaction and "perceived" safety: Examination of patient memory selectivity for possible complications, potential surgical success and failure, depending on the actual postoperative 30-day and long-term course, e.g. Overvaluation of the OP's chances, neglecting the risks, postoperative disappointment etc. 2. Investigation of further influencing factors on the evaluation of the benefit-risk relation, e.g. OP (2 different OPs for comparison) of comorbidities, sex and age. 3. Is it possible to arrange the surgical discussion so that the postoperative mean patient satisfaction and quality of life in the case of a complicated postoperative course is better than before?

—

Countries

Germany

Contacts

Public ContactAndrej Udelnow

Städtisches Klinikum DessauKlinik für Gefäß- und Endovsakuläre Chirurgie/Phlebologie

andrej.udelnow@klinikum-dessau.de+49-340-501-1220

Outcome results

None listed

Source: DRKS (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026