Skip to content

Influence of Contralateral Routing of Signals (CROS) on Hearing Abilities of Different Groups of Cochlear Implant Users

Influence of Contralateral Routing of Signals (CROS) on Hearing Abilities of Different Groups of Cochlear Implant Users - ABIntl-17-14

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
DRKS
Registry ID
DRKS00013973
Enrollment
50
Registered
2018-03-16
Start date
2018-02-20
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-04-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Z96.2

Interventions

Group 1: Bilateral Cochlea Implant User group (N=10) speech intelligibility in quiet and noise, localization abilities, audiograms, subjective feedback via questionnaires Group 2: Unilateral Cochlea

Sponsors

Advanced Bionics GmbHEuropean Research Center
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to No maximum

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: •Unilateral group: CII, HiRes90K, HiRes90K Advantage or HiRes Ultra implant system on one side •Bimodal group: CII, HiRes90K, HiRes90K Advantage or HiRes Ultra implant system on one side and hearing aid contralaterally •Bilateral group: CII, HiRes90K, HiRes90K Advantage or HiRes Ultra implant system on both sides •Minimum of 18 years of age •Minimum of six months experience with their hearing devices •65% speech recognition for the OlSa in quiet at 65 dB SPL with CI only (1st side) •German language proficiency •Ability to provide subjective feedback on sound quality and speech understanding

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: • Difficulties additional to hearing impairment that would interfere with the study procedures.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
•Speech intellegibility with CI and contralateral CROS device versus CI and unaided contralateral side •OLSa measurment in dB in noise •unilateral CI recipients

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
•Comparison of different device configurations (CI only, CI + CROS, CI + HA, CI + CI) in terms of differences in speech intelligibility in quiet •Comparison of different device configurations (CI only, CI + CROS, CI + HA, CI + CI) as well as different microphone options (omni, UltraZoom, StereoZoom) in terms of differences in speech intelligibility in stationary speech shaped noise •Comparison of different device configurations (CI only, CI + CROS, CI + HA, CI + CI) in terms of differences in localization abilities.

Countries

Germany

Contacts

Public ContactMartina Brendel

Advanced Bionics AG

martina.brendel@advancedbionics.com+41 58 928 78 00

Outcome results

None listed

Source: DRKS (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026