Skip to content

Efficacy of an online stress management training for beginning teachers

Efficacy of an online stress management training for beginning teachers

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
DRKS
Registry ID
DRKS00013880
Enrollment
200
Registered
2018-02-23
Start date
2018-08-11
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-12-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Perceived Stress

Interventions

Sponsors

Leuphana Universität Professur für Gesundheitspsychologie und Angewandte Biologische Psychologie Institut für Psychologie
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to No maximum

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: increased stress level (PSS-10) = 22), being a trainee teacher, internet access

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: - diagnosed psychosis or dissociative symptoms in the past - current psychotherapy, on a waiting list for a psychotherapy or intention to start a psychotherapy in a short time - Starting or changing a drug treatment because of stress, anxiety, or depressive complaints in the last 4 weeks. - increased suicide risk (BDI-II value for question 9 > 1)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Level of perceived stress as measured by the perceived stress scale (PSS-10, Cohen, 1983), in screening (S), before intervention (t0), after intervention (t1), at 3-month follow-up (t2 ), as well as in a 6-month follow-up (t3, intervention group only).

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
• Demographic variables (S) • Depression - ADS-K (Hautzinger, Bailer, Hofmeister, & Keller, 2012) (t0, t1, t2, t3) • Fear at the start of a teacher career - self-developed questionnaire (t0, t1, t2, t3) • Anxiety - GAD-7 (Löwe et al., 2008) (t0, t1, t2, t3) • Emotional exhaustion- MBI-GS-D-EE - (Büssing & Perrar, 1992) (t0, t1, t2, t3) • Insomnia - ISI (Morin, Belleville, Bélanger, & Ivers, 2011) (t0, t1, t2, t3) • Cognitive irritation - IS-KI (Mohr, Rigotti, & Müller, 2005) (t0, t1, t2, t3) • Occupational situation - adapted version ERI-S (Siegrist, Wege, Pühlhofer, & Wahrendorf, 2009) (t0, t1, t2, t3) Absentism (Tic-P: Item B1 & B2) (Hakkaart-van Roijen, Donker, & Tiemens, 2002) (t0, t1, t2, t3) Presentism (Tic-P: Item C1) (Hakkaart-van Roijen, Donker, & Tiemens, 2002) (t0, t1, t2, t3) • job satisfaction (adapted by Kunter et al., 2010) (t0, t1, t2, t3) • General self-efficacy (Schwarzer & Schmitz, 1999) (t0, t1, t2, t3) • Emotional Regulation Skills - Subscales: Understanding, Acceptance and Self-Support - SEK-27 (Berking & Znoj, 2008) (t0, t1, t2, t3) • Problem Solving Capabilities - Subscales: Negative Problem Orientation and Avoidance - SPSI-R (D'Zurilla, Nezu, & Maydeu-Olivares, 2002) (t0, t1, t2, t3) • Classroom management self-efficacy (Tschannen-Moran & Hoy, 2001) (t0, t1, t2, t3) • Client Satisfaction - CSQ-8 (Hakkaart-van Roijen, Donker, & Tiemens, 2002) (t1) Dropout reasons (t1) * S: Screening t0: pre t1: post t2: 3-month follow-up t3: 6-month follow-up

Countries

Germany

Contacts

Public ContactHanna Heckendorf

Leuphana Universität Professur für Gesundheitspsychologie und Angewandte Biologische Psychologie Institut für Psychologie

gelassen@leuphana.de04131-677-2721

Outcome results

None listed

Source: DRKS (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026