K08.1
Conditions
Interventions
Sponsors
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
Inclusion criteria: 1. One-abutment-one-time concept (arm1, this is an exclusion criteria for arm 2, arm 2 inclusion criteria are gingivaformer) 2. Possibility of follow-up appointment 3. Implant exposure between January 2013 and December 2016 4. Existing X-ray images of implant insertion and exposure 5. Documentation complete 6. Single tooth implant 7. Natural mesial neighboring tooth, healthy or adequately restored 8. Not integrated into other clinical trial 9. Implant in situ
Exclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria: 1. Supply via provisional abutment (arm1, inclusion criteria for arm 2) 2. Patients can not be reached anymore 3. Implant exposure outside the examination period 4. X-ray documentation incomplete 5. Documentation incomplete 6. Restored as anchor implant with implant / compound bridge 7. Missing / deeply destroyed / insufficiently restored adjacent teeth 8. Implant no longer in situ
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Differences in the health of the peri-implant tissue of two different implant care concepts assessed by biomarkers and enzymes from peri-implant crevicular fluid (PICF), probing depths, papillary bleeding index and bone degradation during follow-up at the time of study | — |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| In the evaluation of the PICF measurement the inflammation marker calprotectin will be determined in addition to the established marker MMP-8,. Calprotectin has been established as a inflammation marker for the oral area in the Department of Prosthetic Dentistry at Ulm University Clinic. A comparison of the two markers shall be presented. | — |
Countries
Germany
Contacts
Klinik für Zahnärztliche Prothetik Universitätsklinikum Ulm