Functional midterm follow-up (2-11 years) comparison of stemless total shoulder prostheses versus conventional stemmed anatomic shoulder prostheses using a 3D-motion-analysis

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Observational

Source

DRKS

Registry ID

DRKS00013166

Enrollment

Registered

2017-10-23

Start date

2017-10-17

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2025-04-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

M19.91

Interventions

Group 1: Group of stemless prostheses, 3-D-motion Analysis at one Point of time, clinical examination, ascertainment of the constant score Group 2: group of Standard anatomical shoulder protheses, the

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

All

Age

18 Years to No maximum

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria were diagnosis with primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis with an intact rotator cuff. A stemless shoulder prosthesis or a conventionel shoulder prosthesis must be implanted

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria were previous operations at the shoulder (except the implantation of a conventionell/ stemlsess shoulder prosthesis) and rotator cuff tears.

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Functional midterm follow-up (2-11 years) comparison of stemless total shoulder prostheses versus conventional stemmed anatomic shoulder prostheses using a 3D-motion-analysis at one Point of time and survey of the constant score at one Point of time	—

Countries

Germany

Contacts

Public ContactDavid Spranz

Orthopädische Universitätsklinik Heidelberg

david.spranz@med.uni-heidelberg.de062215634802

Outcome results

None listed

Source: DRKS (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Mar 8, 2026