Skip to content

Relaparotomy Study - A prospective analysis of the standard of care and outcomes of patients undergoing relaparotomy with one randomized step (fascial closure)

Relaparotomy Study - A prospective analysis of the standard of care and outcomes of patients undergoing relaparotomy with one randomized step (fascial closure) - ReLap Study

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
DRKS
Registry ID
DRKS00013001
Enrollment
150
Registered
2017-09-15
Start date
2017-09-18
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-04-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Abdominal re-operations Primary laparotomy

Interventions

Group 1: every patient that is undergoing primary laparotomy due to their disease Group 2: every patient that is undergoing relaparotomy due to their disease and whose fascial closure will be performe

Sponsors

Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to No maximum

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: experimental group: relaparotomy of every kind, not depending on the underlying disease; control group: primary laparotomy of every kind, not depending on the underlying desease

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: primary reason of the relaparotomy is an incisional hernia or laparostoma; surgery in retroperitoneum without transperitoneal acces, urgency operation; underaged or non-compliant patient

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Due to the lack of existing literature it was not possible to choose a confirmatory statistical design with one primary endpoint. Standard of care of the surgical procedure compared between Primary and re-laparotomy: assessed intraoperatively. Adhesions according to the „Peritoneal adhesion index“ with translational correlation: assessed intraoperatively with tissue sample from normal peritoneum and if applicable from adhesions. Postoperative complications according to Clavien-Dindo assessed until discharge or at least at postoperative day 30. Comprehensive Complication Index assessed until discharge or at least at postoperative day 30. Incisional hernia assessed after 12 months Length of Hospital stay assessed as the difference of days between the index operation and day of discharge. Length of stay on ICU assessed until discharge or at least at postoperative day 30. Bowel movements assessed as days between the indexoperation and the day of first flatus or stool. Quality of life (EQ5D: Pre-operative, discharge and after 12 months) Additional for patients undergoing relaparotomy: Feasibility of fascial closure with both suture techniques according to the operating surgeon. Technique of fascial closure: material and technique actually used. Time to close abdomen: time between start of fascial closure and end of skin closure. Burst abdomen assessed as the need for a reoperation due to fascial insufficency during the hospital stay.

Countries

Germany

Contacts

Public ContactPascal Probst

Universitätsklinikum HeidelbergKlinik für Allgemein-, Viszeral- und Transplantationschirurgie

pascal.probst@med.uni-heidelberg.de+496221 56 36337

Outcome results

None listed

Source: DRKS (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 27, 2026