Skip to content

Effectiveness of rehabilitative therapy after primary knee TEP implantation

Effectiveness of rehabilitative therapy after primary knee TEP implantation - Knie-TEP-Reha

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
DRKS
Registry ID
DRKS00012490
Enrollment
160
Registered
2019-07-22
Start date
2013-02-06
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-04-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

M17

Interventions

Group 1: Rehabilitation concept: standard therapy Group 2: Rehabilitation concept: focus on walking training Group 3: Rehabilitation concept: focus on home trainer / rotomed Group 4: Rehabilitation co

Sponsors

Orthopädische Klinik der Medizinischen Hochschule Hannover im Annastift
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
45 Years to 80 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: - Patients with surgery-day age from 45 to 80 inclusive - In x-ray proven gonarthrosis - Normal motor function of the lower extremities, documented by clinical examination and absence of history of evidence of neurological disease with change in motor function

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: - Diseases of the cardiovascular system, which result in a greatly reduced burden capacity in everyday life and are considered a contraindication of a physical stress (for example heart failure NYHA stage IV) - Taking medications that affect your balance - Persons with changes in balance and sensory disturbances in the lower extremity due to diseases such as M. Meniere, blindness, polyneuropathy, multiple sclerosis, etc. - Neurological disease with altered motor function of the lower extremities, in particular paresis with a degree of weakness worse than 4/5 or clinically detectable increase in tone or spasticity - Allergy to components of the implanted prosthesis or bone cement - Condition after implantation within the first year after surgery of an endoprosthesis or arthrodesis in adjacent joints - Patient is preoperatively unable to go through the gait lab on a flat track without forearm walkers - Intraoperative periprosthetic fracture with postoperatively required partial load - Higher degree of peripheral paralysis of the affected leg as a surgical complication (at a grade worse than 4/5) - Before the beginning of rehabilitation occurring soft tissue

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
The aim of the present study is to quantitatively record and compare the effectiveness of different therapies in the rehabilitation of patients after implantation of a knee TEP using questionnaires as well as by the non-invasive method of three-dimensional, instrumented gait analysis. Primarily findings about the subjective satisfaction are to be obtained by questionnaire. This happens at follow-up 3 and 6 months after surgery.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Secondary findings will be obtained metrologically with the aid of instrumental gait analysis for kinematic, kinetic and electromyographic parameters. This happens at follow-up 3 and 6 months after surgery.

Countries

Germany

Contacts

Public ContactThilo Flörkemeier

Orthopädische Klinik der Medizinischen Hochschule Hannover im Diakovere Annastift

Thilo.Floerkemeier@diakovere.de0511-5354-527

Outcome results

None listed

Source: DRKS (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026