Skip to content

Gait impairment following stroke: is it a problem of dorsiflexion and trunk instability or rather a problem of plantar flexion?

Gait impairment following stroke: is it a problem of dorsiflexion and trunk instability or rather a problem of plantar flexion? - Plantarflex

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
DRKS
Registry ID
DRKS00011874
Enrollment
56
Registered
2017-03-23
Start date
2016-01-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-04-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

I63.3 G81.1

Interventions

Group 1: The therapy goals oft he experimental group ( Extensor training = ET) are: 1.to enhance elasticity and eccentric control of the Plantarflexors to gain better stability in Mid-stance (MST) an

Sponsors

NRZ Leipzig-Bennewitz,Universität Leipzig
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to 80 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. patients having experienced a supra-tentoriel stroke for the first time which occurred at least 4weeks prior, 2.who measure gait speed slower than 0,4 sec./min. and 3. show a higher risk of falling, measured according to the Dynamic Gait Index (DGI) and Functional ambulation Categories . 4. They must demonstrate weakness of the foot muscles, measured by Muscle Function Tests according to Janda of 3-4. 5.During gait they should not be able to reach initial contact (IC) with the heel and initiate swing (ISW) by compensatory hiking of the pelvis.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Patients who hare not able to walk - with or without aids - are to be excluded. Patient ,who are not able to communicate Patients, who have a neglect Patients with additional neurologic diseases (i.e. SAE, Parkinson Sndrome, MS) Patient with musculosceletal diseases Patients with cancer Patients, who participate in other trials

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Primary outcome parameter: Dymnamic Gait Index is assesd before, at the end of 4 weeks of intervention and 3 months after inclusion into the study

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
secondary outcome parameters : 1.Gait analysis: using video documentation to assess the following parameters: -hip extension, knee control, dorsiflexion, vertical trunk alignment during stance, observed from the sagital plane. -Knee flexion during pre-swing, observed from the sagital plane. -Stride length and heel lift during Terminal stance, observed from the sagital plane. -Heel contact during initial contact, observed from the sagital plane. -Forefoot pronation during Mid-stance and Terminal stance, observed from ventral in the frontal plane. -Hiking of the hip during Initial swing, observed from dorsal in the frontal plane. 2.Gait speed: 10 Meters. 3.Functional Ambulation Categories (FAS) 4.Muskel function tests (Janda): Dorsi- and Plantarflexors (ankle and toes), knee flexors, -extensors, hip extensors, -flexors, -abductors, -adductors

Countries

Germany

Contacts

Public ContactCaroline Renner

NRZ Leipzig-Bennewitz,Universität Leipzig

renner@sachsenklinik.de03425888195

Outcome results

None listed

Source: DRKS (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026