Skip to content

Comparison of the Glidescope videolaryngoscope with the Macintosh laryngsope in patients undergoing a rapid sequence induction

Comparison of the Glidescope videolaryngoscope with the Macintosh laryngsope in patients undergoing a rapid sequence induction - none

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
DRKS
Registry ID
DRKS00011542
Enrollment
60
Registered
2017-01-24
Start date
2009-06-03
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-04-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Airwaymanagement

Interventions

Group 1: Patients needing a rapid sequence induction. Intubation with Glidescope Videolaryngoscope. Group 2: Patients needing a rapid sequence induction. Intubation with Macintosh laryngoscope.

Sponsors

Departement of Anaesthesia and Critical Care
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to 100 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patients with criteria for a rapid-sequence induction ( BMI >30, Gastrooesophagelaer Reflux)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Pregnancy, patients under 18 years of age, emergency cases

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Visualization of the Glottis during intubation. Comparison of the Cormack and Lehane grading between groups.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Time needed for successful intubation.Time when the tube pass the patients lips until the tube pass the vocal cords.

Countries

Germany

Contacts

Public ContactSimone Brück

Universitätsklinikum Ulm

brueckstudie@gmail.com0731-500-0

Outcome results

None listed

Source: DRKS (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026