Skip to content

Effectiveness of different power tooth brushes in comparison of instructed and non-instructed patients - a randomized clinical case control study

Effectiveness of different power tooth brushes in comparison of instructed and non-instructed patients - a randomized clinical case control study

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
DRKS
Registry ID
DRKS00011422
Enrollment
150
Registered
2017-01-23
Start date
2015-07-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-10-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

K05.1

Interventions

Group 1: manualtooth brush with instructions: during the whole study period patients were only allowed to use the manual toothbrush for their daily oral hygiene. At each study related appointment, pat

Sponsors

Universitätsklinikum Leipzig Poliklinik für Zahnerhaltung und Parodontologie
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to 30 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: •caries-free, sufficently treated teeth •periodontally healthy conditions, i.e. no periodontal treatment need (PSI/PSR score maximum 2, gingivitis) •at least 20 remaining teeth •gender male or female, age between 18 and 30 years •smoker or non-smoker •ability to give informed consent •voluntary participation

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: •age 30 years •impossibility of oral examination caused by high mortality •presence of general disorders: diabetes mellitus, insufficiently controlled hypertonia •immunosuppressed participants: organ transplant, rheumatoid arthritis, further autoimmune diseases (chronical bowel diseases) •participants for which an endocarditis prophylaxis would be necessary because of a heart disease (heart valvule prosthesis) •presence of hepatitis A, B, C, TBC, HIV •participants with renal insufficiency •participants with epileptic or neurological disorders •addicts •known intolerance against ingredients of the used toothpaste •pregnancy •presence of periodontal treatment need (PSI/PSR >3) •participants with clearly compromised muskolosceletal system (missing fine motorical skills) •medical or dental background (student, physician/dentist, jobs from dental or medical area)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
papilla-bleeding-index (PBI) at each investigation time point with a periodontal probe (PCP 15, Hu-Friedy, Chicago, IL, USA) and marginal-plaque-index (MPI) at each investigation time point visually

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Quigley-Hein-index (QHI) at each investigation time point visually after coloration with Mita-2-Ton, gingival index (GI) at each investigation time point visually (signs of gingival inflammation e.g. erythema, swelling)

Countries

Germany

Contacts

Public ContactDirk Ziebolz

Universitätsklinikum LeipzigPoliklinik für Zahnerhaltung und Parodontologie

Dirk.Ziebolz@medizin.uni-leipzig.de0341 9721211

Outcome results

None listed

Source: DRKS (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026