C20 C22 C18 C19
Conditions
Interventions
Sponsors
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
Inclusion criteria: - Consent from the patient • HCC or secondary hepatic metastatic carcinoma • Indication for RE (SIRT) in one or two sessions • male or female,> 18 years • Approval of all study procedures participate
Exclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria: • Contraindication radioembolization liver • Contraindications for vascular embolization (for example, retrograde flow of the gastroduodenal artery at Tr. Celiac stenosis) • Whipple procedure with resection / ligation of the gastroduodenal artery • Billroth surgical resection of gastric artery • diameter of the gastroduodenal artery> 4.5 mm in the planning CTA • Contraindications to angiography, X-ray contrast medium CT • Known allergy to nickel
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Safety and effectiveness of MicroPlug embolization compared to the coil embolization (macro plug) of the gastroduodenal artery during the evaluation of the liver Radioembolization The security checks by an unraised complication in the experimental group. The effectiveness is studied by means of a sufficient embolization without reperfusion in the angiographic control during therapy. | — |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| 1.The safety and effectiveness of the micro plug-embolization compared to the coil embolization (macro plug) of the right gastric artery during the evaluation of a liver radioembolization. 2. Descriptive analysis reviewed: - The whole procedure time, - The fluoroscopy time, - The pure embolization time, - Number of embolization materials used, - Volume of the contrast agent used, - frequency of embolic-related complications, - the reperfusion of embolized vessels in a two-armed cohort | — |
Countries
Germany
Contacts
Universitätsklinik für Radiologie und Nuklearmedizin