Skip to content

comparison of piezosurgery and conventional instruments in cranioplasty

comparison of piezosurgery and conventional instruments in cranioplasty

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
DRKS
Registry ID
DRKS00010553
Enrollment
34
Registered
2016-06-08
Start date
2014-07-24
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-04-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Q75.0

Interventions

Group 1: osteotomy with standard instruments (rotary instruments [Hilan] and microsaw Group 2: osteotomy with piezosurgery device

Sponsors

Kinderneurochirurgie Asklepios Kinderklinik
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
3 Months to 48 Months

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: patients with craniosynostosis (trigonocephalus, plagiocephalus, brachycephalus, syndromale craniosynostosis) and indication for frontooribital Advancement

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: congenital heart defect, bleeding diathesis, systemic bone diseases

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
surgery time, complete blood count and amount of blood transfusion, soft tissue tears, edema, pain and bone healing are documented. The data evaluation is finished with the last parameters 4 - 6 month after cranioplasty (at the time of plate removal): the appraisal of ossification

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Postoperatively, the volume of blood losses through surgical hemoglobin measured three times during the first 5 days after surgery and a pain score is evaluated

Countries

Germany

Contacts

Public ContactMartina Messing-Jünger

Abteilung für KinderneurochirurgieAsklepios Kinderklinik

m.messing@asklepios.com02241-249246

Outcome results

None listed

Source: DRKS (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026