Skip to content

Prospective multicenter Study to evaluate the Effect of tight and systematic monitoring by Ultrasound on Therapy and Outcome in Patients with early rheumatoid Arthritis

Prospective multicenter Study to evaluate the Effect of tight and systematic monitoring by Ultrasound on Therapy and Outcome in Patients with early rheumatoid Arthritis - US Impera Study

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
DRKS
Registry ID
DRKS00010485
Enrollment
440
Registered
2016-06-01
Start date
2010-09-06
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-04-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

rheumatoid arthritis M05

Interventions

Group 1: RA patients who receive an additional US examination by the US7 score to standard clinical care Group 2: RA patients who (only) get a clinical examination by standard clinical care.

Sponsors

Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin -Med. Klinik mit SP Rheumatologie und Klin. Immunologie
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to No maximum

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: •Patients, at least 18 years of age, with currently active RA with or without re-ceiving DMARDs. Active disease is defined as DAS 28 > 3.2 and at least swollen joint count (SJC) = 3 and tender joint count (TJC) = 3 included in the 28 joint count. •Early RA (= 2 years from time of onset of arthritic symptoms)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: •Patients receiving biologics •Patients with other chronic inflammatory articular disease or systemic autoimmune disease •Patients with erosions in conventional radiography taken less than 3 months before start of study •Patients participating in other studies •Any active infection, a history of recurrent clinically significant infection, a history of recurrent bacterial infections with encapsulated organisms (known Hepatitis B, C and HIV) •Primary or secondary immunodeficiency •History of cancer with curative treatment not longer than 5 years ago except basal-cell carcinoma of the skin that had been excised •Evidence of significant uncontrolled concomitant diseases or serious and / or uncontrolled diseases that are likely to interfere with the evaluation of the patient's safety and of the study outcome •Women lactating, pregnant, nursing or of childbearing potential with a positive pregnancy test or planned pregnancy. •Women of childbearing potential without adequate contraception (medically acceptable methods are contraceptive implant, contraceptive injection, intrauterine device (IUD), or oral contraceptives taken for at least 3 months, which the patient agrees to continue using during the study, or a double-barrier method which must consist of a combination of any of the following: diaphragma, cervical cap, comdom, or spermicide) •History of alcohol, drug or chemical abuse (defined as impaired / questionable reliability) as well as neurotic personality. •Neuropathy that can interfere with filling out the patient's questionnaires •History of a severe psychological illness or condition •Severe heart failure (New York Heart Association Class III and IV) or severe, uncontrolled cardiac disease •Women lactating, pregnant, nursing or child bearing potential with a positive pregnancy test or planned pregnancy. •Women of childbearing potential without adequate contraception (medically acceptable methods are contraceptive implant, contraceptive injection •no written consent

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Compare functional outcome in patients monitored according to standard care vs. patients additionally monitored by using US7 score. Functional outcome is measured by HAQ.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
1. Compare disease activity in patients monitored according to standard care vs. patients additionally monitored by using US7 score. 2. Describe ultrasound driven changes in therapy, e.g. escalation of therapy in dose and regimen 3. Describe change, practicability and costs in patient management and resource allocation in clinic and outpatient clinics related to use of US7 score. 4. How does US7 score influence the therapeutic decisions? 5. Evaluate the clinician’s confidence with regards to his/her decision (on a visual analogue scale) before and after US examination. 6. Define criteria for imaging remission based on functional outcome and disease activity.

Countries

Germany

Contacts

Public ContactGabriela Schmittat

Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin - Med. Klinik mit SP Rheumatologie und Klin. Immunologie

gabriela.schmittat@charite.de030 450 513 247

Outcome results

None listed

Source: DRKS (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026