Skip to content

Comparison between fascial treatment and high velocity low amplitude (HVLA) treatment in patients with chronic neck pain

Comparison between fascial treatment and high velocity low amplitude (HVLA) treatment in patients with chronic neck pain

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
DRKS
Registry ID
DRKS00010398
Enrollment
60
Registered
2016-04-21
Start date
2012-07-15
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-04-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

M54.92

Interventions

Group 1: Fascial treatment, 4 treatments a 20min within a time period of 2 wekks Group 2: Manual Therapy treatment (HVLA), 4 treatments a 20min within a time period of 2 wekks Group 3: Control Group w

Sponsors

Universität Hamburg Fakultät für Psychologie und BewegungswissenschaftInstitut für BewegungswissenschaftArbeitsbereich Sport- und Bewegungsmedizin
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
30 Years to 65 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: agw 30 to 65 years of age; average neck pain intensity on a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) should have been >2 within the last three months; (c) present of at least one segmental dysfunction of the cervical and/or upper thoracic spine; (d) present of at least one restrictive fascia of the neck

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: systemic conditions, such as cancer, severe osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis or systemic lupus erythematosus, any neurological conditions, any kind of manual therapy of the neck within the last four weeks, surgery of the cervical or thoracic spine in the past, whiplash in the past, surgery of the neck and/or cervical spine in the past, contraindication for HVLA.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Self-reportet pain by visual analog scale (VAS), before and after each treatment

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Self-reportet Pain (VAS), Self-reportet functionality by Neck Pain Disability Questionnaire (NPAD), Range of motion of the cervical spine by CROM Device before and after each treatment (=4 time points)

Countries

Germany

Contacts

Public ContactTobias Schmidt

Universität Hamburg Fakultät für Psychologie und BewegungswissenschaftInstitut für BewegungswissenschaftArbeitsbereich Sport- und Bewegungsmedizin

tobias.schmidt@uni-hamburg.de040428389146

Outcome results

None listed

Source: DRKS (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026