Skip to content

Randomized clinical Trail on effects of negotiating a Joint Crisis Plans (JSP) on illness perception and trust in hospital physicians in inpatients with severe mental illnesses and observation of patients' satisfaction and admission experience and use of coercion in a subsequent hospitalization.

Randomized clinical Trail on effects of negotiating a Joint Crisis Plans (JSP) on illness perception and trust in hospital physicians in inpatients with severe mental illnesses and observation of patients' satisfaction and admission experience and use of coercion in a subsequent hospitalization. - JCPUKE

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
DRKS
Registry ID
DRKS00010168
Enrollment
40
Registered
2016-05-06
Start date
2016-05-20
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-04-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

F20-F29 F30-F39

Interventions

Group 1: Treatment group: participants are offered a negotiation procedure to create a Joint Crisis Plan about two weeks before the predicted end of their current psychiatric hospital stay besides the

Sponsors

Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), Klinik und Poliklinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie - Spezialambulanz für Psychosen und Bipolare Störungen,
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to No maximum

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. capacity to consent regarding participation in the study and related activities (negotiation and completion of a Joint Crisis Plan) 2. over 18 years of age 3. sufficient understanding of the German language 4. principal diagnosis in ICD-10 main groups F20-F29 or F30-F39 5. count and duration of psychiatric hospitalizations: 2 and more stays with at least 14 days in total until study entry Note: Criterion 5 is not required for UKE sector patients and involuntarily admitted patients. 6. minimum of 14 days left until an expectable discharge by clinical judgement

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. lack of written informed consent 2. serious somatic or organic brain disorder

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
---------------- IPQ-R Personal control ---------------- What: personal control as part of the Illness Perception Model When: pre, post, fup (fup with treatment group only) How: Illness Perception Questionnaire – Revised, Subscale "Personal control", German Version (IPQ-R; Gaab, Bunschoten, Sprott, & Ehlert, 2004, 2008; Moss-Morris et al., 2002), self-report questionnaire Course of measurements: 1. pretreatment measurement at study entry 2. treatment or waiting-list control 3. posttreatment-/postwaitlist measurement 4 weeks after pretreatment measurement 4. follow-up measurement: 26 weeks after posttreatment measurement, with treatment group only 5. measurement with returning patients during subsequent hospital stay starting max. 3 years after index stay.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
---------------- IPQ-R Treatment control ---------------- What: Treatment control as part of the Illness Perception Model When: pre, post, fup (fup with treatment group only) How: Illness Perception Questionnaire – Revised, Subscale "Treatment control", German Version (IPQ-R; Gaab, Bunschoten, Sprott, & Ehlert, 2004, 2008; Moss-Morris et al., 2002), self-report questionnaire ---------------- IPQ-R Coherence ---------------- What: illness coherence as part of the Illness Perception Model When: pre, post, fup (fup with treatment group only) How: Illness Perception Questionnaire – Revised, Subscale "Illness coherence", German Version (IPQ-R; Gaab, Bunschoten, Sprott, & Ehlert, 2004, 2008; Moss-Morris et al., 2002), self-report questionnaire ----------------- VIA ----------------- What: trust in hospital physician When: pre, post, fup (fup with treatment group only) How: "Trust in Physician scale" (TPS; german Version, Anderson & Dedrick, 1990; Glattacker, Gülich, Farin, & Jäckel, 2007), self-report questionnaire ----------------- ZUF-8 ----------------- What: questionnaire on patient satisfaction with in-patient hospital care When: pre, return (end of a subsequent hospital stay) How: "Fragebogen zur Patientenzufriedenheit" (Schmidt, Lamprecht, & Wittmann, 1989; Schmidt, Nübling, Lamprecht, & Wittmann, 1994), self-report questionnaire ----------------- FEA-P ----------------- What: Evaluation of admission to a psychiatric hospital by patients When: pre, return (end of a subsequent hospital stay) How: "Fragebogen zum Erleben der Aufnahme in einer Klinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie" (FEA-P, Driessen et al., 2013; Wertz et al., 2013), self-report questionnaire ----------------- CI ----------------- What: subjective an objective coercive incidents during a hospitalization When: pre, return (end of a subsequent hospital stay) How: "CI Coercive Incidents"(Høyer et al., 2002; Iversen, Høyer, Sexton, & Grønli, 2002; Kjellin & Wallsten, 2010) combined instrument;

Countries

Germany

Contacts

Public ContactRené Uhlig

Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), Klinik und Poliklinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie

rene.uhlig@gmail.com0163-3539233

Outcome results

None listed

Source: DRKS (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026