Accuracy of optical vs. conventional impression methods in partially edentulous patients

Accuracy of optical vs. conventional impression methods in partially edentulous patients - COIM PEJ

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Observational

Source

DRKS

Registry ID

DRKS00010029

Enrollment

Registered

2016-02-17

Start date

2016-03-01

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2025-04-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Partially edentulous patients

Interventions

Group 1: Partially edentulous patient in need of an removable partial denture, will receive a conventional impression of the dentated and edentulous spaces using elastomeric materials. Group 2: Partia

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

All

Age

18 Years to No maximum

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: - Treatment at the Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Center for Dental Medicine, Department of Prosthetic Dentistry - Partially edentulous patients receiving a prosthetic reconstruction in the upper and/or lower jaw with a varying number of abutment teeth (= 2)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Infectious diseases, pregnancy, nonage, missing informed consent

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
The feasibility/accuracy of computerized optical impression making will be evaluated using 3D software after the conventional and computerized optical impressions.	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
The patient satisfaction of the conventional and computerized impression methods will be evaluated using a specially design questionnaire.	—

Countries

Germany

Contacts

Public ContactSebastian Patzelt

Universitätsklinikum Freiburg, Department für Zahn-, Mund- und Kieferheilkunde, Klinik für Zahnärztliche Prothetik

sebastian.patzelt@uniklinik-freiburg.de0761-270 47640

Outcome results

None listed

Source: DRKS (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026