Fluid Responsiveness
Conditions
Interventions
Group 1: Comparison of the stroke volume variation (SVV) and the pulse pressure variation (PPV) derived by pulse contour analysis with the variations of the blood flow velocity in the LVOT and the aor
Sponsors
Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Inclusion criteria
Inclusion criteria: Adult patients who were scheduled for coronary artery bypass grafting
Exclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria: Permanent absence of cardiac sinus rhythm (i.e. atrial fibrillation), highly impaired left and/or right ventricular function (ejection fraction <30%). mid- or high grade valve stenosis and/or insufficieny. Contraindications to transesophageal echocardiography.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| The primary goal of this study is to proof that the parameters measured by echocardiography to describe the fluid responsiveness are comparable to the paramters derived by pulse contour analysis. | — |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| The secondary goal of this study is to show that the cardiac output measured by echocardiography is comparable to the cardiac output measured by pulse contour analysis. | — |
Countries
Germany
Contacts
Public ContactAdrian Stephan
Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg
Outcome results
None listed