Skip to content

Chemical renal denervation for the treatment of resistant hypertension

Chemical renal denervation for the treatment of resistant hypertension - CRASH

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
DRKS
Registry ID
DRKS00008746
Enrollment
100
Registered
2019-06-19
Start date
2019-06-28
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-06-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

I10.9

Interventions

Group 1: Therapy Arm: 24-hour blood pressure measurements and automated office-blood-pressure (RR) measurements are taken before the intervention (baseline). After patient approval, therapy is perform

Sponsors

Klinikum der Universität München, Campus Großhadern
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to 75 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: • Patient with therapy-resistant type. Hypertonicity (syst. RR> 140 mmHg despite optimized therapy with = 3 antihypertensive drugs of different classes - state of the art over 3 months), • Diagnosis of the therapy-resistant type. Hypertension by a specialist in nephrology / high-pressure ambulance takes place incl. Advice on all alternative therapy methods • GFR> 45 ml / min / 1.73 m² Pat. With refractory hypertension at Z.n. ineffective catheter-directed RDN

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: • patients with secondary hypertension (e.g., renoparenchymatous hypertension, NAST, primary hyperaldosteronism, pheochromocytoma, sleep apnea syndrome) • Stenosing heart valve disease • Z.n. Myocardial infarction, unstable angina pectoris, cerebrovascular event within the last 6 months prior to enrollment

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
The procedure leads to a permanent lowering of blood pressure compared to the control group (state of the art antihypertensive medication plus sham treatment).

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
• Permanent reduction of antihypertensive medication in patients with refractory hypertension compared to sham control • Compared to catheter-guided radiofrequency ablation, the procedure is simpler, faster, less expensive, and feasible for patients with a contraindication to RFA.

Countries

Germany

Contacts

Public ContactChristel Besseler

Klinik und Poliklinik für Radiologie Klinikum der Universität München Campus Großhadern

christel.besseler@med.uni-muenchen.de(089) 4400-73647

Outcome results

None listed

Source: DRKS (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Jun 11, 2026