Skip to content

CAD/CAM hybrid-ceramic/composite vs. ceramic minimal invasive therapeutical intervention of severe non carious lesions: Clinical performance and quality of life improvement

CAD/CAM hybrid-ceramic/composite vs. ceramic minimal invasive therapeutical intervention of severe non carious lesions: Clinical performance and quality of life improvement - MINERVA Pilot

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
DRKS
Registry ID
DRKS00007102
Enrollment
6
Registered
2015-08-26
Start date
2015-03-20
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-04-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

K03.2

Interventions

Group 1: Computer aided design and computer aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) technology will be used to fabricate minimal invasive restorations from machinable composite materials. Affected anterior teet

Sponsors

Universitätsklinikum Freiburg
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to No maximum

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: • Patients = 18 years of age • Patients that reveal extensive erosive lesions (Basic Erosive Wear Examination/BEWE Index 14-18) due to exogenous (former excessive consumption of acidic drinks) or endogenous factors (exposure to gastric juice due to gastro oesophageal reflux disease (GERD) or eating disorders such as bulimia and anorexia nervosa) • Patients with severe loss (> 2 mm) of the vertical dimension of occlusion • Patients with hypersensitivity of the teeth • Patients with reduced chewing ability • Patients with impaired aesthetics • Patients compliant to fill out questionnaires on food behaviour forms • Patients that will be in need of a full-mouth rehabilitation (n=14-28 teeth per patient); Cessation of erosion progression is mandatory • Favourable and stable occlusal relationship • Sufficient height of abutment teeth (4.5 mm) • Vital and non-vital abutment teeth, which are free of any radiologic diagnosable pathological changes and which are clinically acceptable, or which exhibit a lege artis endodontic treatment • Pocket depth at the abutment teeth < 4 mm • Tooth mobility < II • Multi-root teeth furcation < 2 • Sufficient treated dentition or planned treatment in the course of the therapy (in this case, the costs are supported by the patient)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: • Patients that reveal erosive lesions due to a history of alcohol or drug (methamphetamine/ecstasy) abuse, missing teeth, poor oral hygiene (pocket depths > 3mm, Papillary Bleeding Index > 35% or pronounced parafunctions) • Patients with allergies to any of the materials applied during the study • Patients with diseases whose general status falls into the category IV of the American Society of Anaesthesiologists/ASA classification (patients with live-threatening severe general diseases and obvious limitation of their activity) • Patients with psychiatric problems • Severe bruxism, malocclusion (deep bite, non-occlusion, cross bite) or other destructive habits • Patients without opposing dentition • Patients with acute symptoms of a functional disorder, which requires a functional pre-treatment prior to the prosthetic therapy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Feasibility (patient’s expectation and evaluation of the treatment outcome) messured at 1 year follow-up

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Failure time, Saftey: Rate of (Serious) Adverse Events over 1 year

Countries

Germany

Contacts

Public ContactPetra Gierthmühlen

Universitätsklinikum FreiburgKlinik für Zahnärztliche Prothetik Department für Zahn-, Mund- und Kieferheilkunde

PetraChristine.Gierthmuehlen@med.uni-duesseldorf.de+49 761 270 48440

Outcome results

None listed

Source: DRKS (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026