Ultra-mini PCNL vs. flexible ureteroscopy: a matched analysis of treatment costs (endoscopes and disposables) in patients with renal stones 10 – 20 mm

Ultra-mini PCNL vs. flexible ureteroscopy: a matched analysis of treatment costs (endoscopes and disposables) in patients with renal stones 10 – 20 mm - UMP vs. FURS costs

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Observational

Source

DRKS

Registry ID

DRKS00006957

Enrollment

Registered

2014-10-21

Start date

2014-11-01

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2025-04-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

N20.0 N20.1

Interventions

Group 1: Ultra-mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy Group 2: Flexible ureterorenoscopy

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

All

Age

18 Years to 100 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Renal stone 10 - 20 mm

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: none

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Treatment costs	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
Operating time, length of hospital stay, stone free status, complications	—

Countries

Germany

Contacts

Public ContactMartin Schönthaler

Universitätsklinikum FreiburgKlinik für Urologie

martin.schoenthaler@uniklinik-freiburg.de0761 270 28930

Outcome results

None listed

Source: DRKS (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026