Skip to content

Osypka BabyStent® for the treatment of aortic isthmus stenosis in early childhood

Osypka BabyStent® for the treatment of aortic isthmus stenosis in early childhood - Osypka BabyStent® trial

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
DRKS
Registry ID
DRKS00006303
Enrollment
19
Registered
2014-12-19
Start date
2015-09-10
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-04-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Q25.1

Interventions

Group 1: Implantation of Osypka BabyStent(R)

Sponsors

Universitäts Herzzentrum Freiburg Bad KrozingenKlinik für Angeborene Herzfehler und Pädiatrische Kardiologie
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
0 Weeks to 2 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Patients with stenosis of the aortic isthmus/aortic arch with an inner diameter of the stenosis of 0 to 5 mm requiring treatment 2. Patients from 0 to 24 months of age 3. Body weight from 1.8 to 20 kg 4. Height from 40 to 100 cm 5. Written consent of parents or legal guardian available 6. Patients for whom no further surgical treatment options are available, defined as a. Children who have developed an early re-stenosis after coarctation (CoA) surgery, or b. Children who have developed a re-stenosis after complex aortic arch surgery, in particular children with hypoplastic left heart syndrome following stage 1 Norwood procedure, children with surgical correction of an interrupted aortic arch or previous surgery of aortic arch hypoplasia, or c. High-risk patients with limited treatment options other than stent implantation, e.g. children with VACTERL association, oesophageal atresia and thoracic fistula, or d. Neonates with a severe complex congenital malformation syndrome with life-threatening heart failure due to CoA who require acute treatment prior to final diagnosis (e.g., children with suspected trisomy 18 or 13 with a short life expectancy in the medium term and for whom major surgery is not reasonable). 7. An individual, interdisciplinary consultation has taken place and has been documented in writing in which the paediatric cardiologist as well as the paediatric heart surgeon has considered the catheter-driven intervention (balloon and stent) as a favourable treatment for the patient as compared to open surgery. If, based on the judgment of the treating interventionalist during cardiac catheterisation, a simple balloon angioplasty is considered as insufficient for treating the residual gradient and/or residual stenosis according to the pathology of the underlying heart defect, the Osypka BabyStent® is to be implanted. (This requires a case-by-case decision since the acceptable residual gradient varies for different concomitant heart defects.)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Body weight 20 kg Note: Children with a body weight below 1.8 kg are excluded from this trial since it is unclear whether the growth-related size of the afferent blood vessels is adequate for the use of the required 4-French sheath 2. Sepsis 3. Lack of written consent of parents or legal guardian 4. Lack of interdisciplinary consultation 5. Lack of consent of paediatric cardiac surgeon to interventional procedure 6. Surgical treatment (surgery) is successful for the treatment of the CoA 7. Following balloon dilatation the residual gradient and/or residual stenosis is small enough to consider the treatment as successful even if no stent was placed 8. Cardiac diseases: a. In case the smallest part of the CoA is above 5 mm, or b. In case there is an aneurysm adjacent to the implantation site, or c. Patients requiring surgery due to their concomitant cardiac defect in whom the CoA is well accessible to the surgeon during surgery (e.g., stage 1 Norwood procedure for hypoplastic left heart syndrome), or d. Patients with very long stenoses, severe calcifications or a diffuse disease, i.e. with multiple stenoses. 9. Non-cardiac anomalies: a. In case it is not possible to access the location of the lesion by means of common placing techniques, in particular by using a transport sheath b. Patients with a contraindication to treatment with heparin or aspirin 10. Any other contraindications to cardiac catheterisation, e.g., a. Acute infectious diseases or childhood diseases like e.g., measles, varicella, pertussis b. Severe coagulation disorders (e.g., disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC)) 11. Emergency procedures in which the criteria 3 to 5 have not been fulfilled within an adequate interval prior to the start of cardiac catheterisation. 12. Incompatibility of the reference diameter of the vessel to be treated with the size of the stent. In particular no stent must be placed in vessels with a stenosis diameter of more than 6 mm (maximum size of the balloon).

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Successful implantation defined as implantation in target area and > 50% increase of inner diameter of stenosis compared to inital inner diameter of stenosis, measured by angiography immediately after stent implantation.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
- Pressure gradient at stent area after 4 weeks, 3, 6 and 12 months, measured by Doppler echocardiography. - Numbers of re-interventions up to 12 months after implantation - Access vessel patency after 3 months (Doppler sonography) - Chest X-Ray after 3 months: integrity of stent struts - Optional: in individual cases re-dilatation of stent by balloon angioplasty and bursting of stent with balloon (12 mm balloon diameter) - Safety endpoints: adverse events, vital signs - Total duration of follow-up: 12 months

Countries

Germany

Contacts

Public ContactBrigitte Stiller

Universitäts Herzzentrum Freiburg Bad KrozingenKlinik für Angeborene Herzfehler und Pädiatrische Kardiologie

brigitte.stiller@uniklinik-freiburg.de+49 761 270-43130

Outcome results

None listed

Source: DRKS (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026