Skip to content

Comparison of wound treatment and wound healing with a hyaluronic acid-containing matrix vs. hydrofibre and skin transplant healing rates for defect coverage after resection of skin tumors

Comparison of wound treatment and wound healing with a hyaluronic acid-containing matrix vs. hydrofibre and skin transplant healing rates for defect coverage after resection of skin tumors

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
DRKS
Registry ID
DRKS00006293
Enrollment
52
Registered
2014-07-03
Start date
2014-07-14
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-04-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

C43 C44

Interventions

Group 1: After tumor excision wound treatment with Hyalomatrix (Anika Therapeutics S.r.l) followed by autologous skin graft Group 2: After tumor excision open wound treatment with Aqaucel (Convatec) f

Sponsors

ATG-Med, AT Technologies GmbH
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to No maximum

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Skin Tumor in need of excision and skin transplantation

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Persons aged under 18, Wound infection before surgery, missing informed consent

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Skin transplant take rate 1 week after grafting, as well as after 6-12 months. Scar evaluation with POSAS scar scale and high resolution skin ultrasound examination

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Pain during wound dressing after tumor excision with visual analog pain scale (VAS) scar quaulity (POSAS scar scale) 6-12 months after skin grafting

Countries

Germany

Contacts

Public ContactAlbrecht Krause-Bergmann

Fachklinik HornheideAbteilung für Plastische und Ästhetische Chirurgie, Handchirurgie

pl-chir@fachklinik-hornheide.de0251-3287-441

Outcome results

None listed

Source: DRKS (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026