Skip to content

Online-Based Stress-Management Taining - also effective under unfavourable working conditions? Randomized Controlled Trial

Online-Based Stress-Management Taining - also effective under unfavourable working conditions? Randomized Controlled Trial - GET-ON-Stress unfavourable working conditions

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
DRKS
Registry ID
DRKS00005990
Enrollment
264
Registered
2014-12-16
Start date
2014-12-17
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-04-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

job-related stress

Interventions

Sponsors

Leuphana Universität Lüneburg GET.ON Gesundheitstraining.Online / Innovations-Inkubator
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to No maximum

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: • Effort-Reward Imbalance (score > 0.715 = inclusion; Sigrist, Li, Montano, 2014; Lehr, Koch, Hillert, 2009) • employed • internet access • valid e-mail-address

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: • at baseline slightly suicidal (BDI II item 9 [> 1]) • not willing to sign informed consent • diagnosed psychosis or dissociative symptoms in the past

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Perceived stress measured with the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS-10, Cohen, 1983) at baseline, after completing the training (7 weeks after randomization) and at 6-months-follow-up (6 months after randomization, 6-M-FU)

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
• Demographic Variables Questionnaire (pre) • Emotional exhaustion (Maslach Burnout Inventory, MBI-GS-D, emotional exhaustion scale, Maslach & Jackson, 1981): prä, post (7 weeks), 6-M-FU • Depressive symptoms (CES-D, Hautzinger & Bailer, 1993): pre, post, 6-M-FU • Self-assessed emotional competences (SEK-27, Berking & Znoj, 2008): pre • Effort-Reward Imbalance Scale, short version (ERI-S, Siegrist, Wege, Pühlhofer, & Wahrendorf, 2009): pre, post, 6-M-FU • Dimensions of personality (Big Five Inventory, BFI-10, Rammstedt & John, 2007): pre • Current occupation (self-developed): pre • Work engagement (Utrecht Work Engagement Scale, UWES, Schaufeli, Salanova, González-Romá, & Bakker, 2002): pre, post, 6-M-FU • Assessment of Quality of Life (AQoL, Richardson, Iezzi, Khan, & Maxwell, 2014): measurement of health-related quality of life (pre, 6-M-FU) • Quality of life for economic evaluation (EuroQol, Graf, Claes, Greiner, & Uber): pre, post, 6-M-FU • Cost related to mental and physical impairment (German adaption of Trimbos / iMTA questionnaire for Costs associated with Psychiatric Illness, TiC-P, Van Roijen Hakkaart, 2002): pre, post, 6-M-FU • Volitional competences (Short Form of the Volitional Components Questionnaire, SSI-36, Forstmeier & Rüddel, 2008; subscales of attentional focusing, self-motivation, goal recollection, forgetfulness prevention, impulse control and initiation control): pre • Self-efficacy (SWE, Schwarzer & Jerusalem, 1999): pre • Self-Regulation Scale (SRQ, Schwarzer, 1999): prä • Self-Control Scale (SCS-K-D. Bertrams & Dickhäuser, 2009): pre • Therapy motivation questionnaire (FPTM-23, Schulz, Lang, Nübling, & Koch, 2003): pre • Task-related motivational and volitional factors in line with the Health Action Process Approach (HAPA, according to guidelines by Schwarzer et al., 2003): pre • Internet Affinity Scale (Papacharissi & Rubin, 2000), measuring internet affinity (pre) • Work Limitations Questionnaire (WLQ-8, Lerner, Amick, Rogers, Malspeis,

Countries

Germany

Contacts

Public ContactAnna-Carlotta Zarski

Leuphana Universität Lüneburg GET.ON Gesundheitstraining.Online / Innovations-Inkubator

Zarski@inkubator.leuphana.de0049 41316777856

Outcome results

None listed

Source: DRKS (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 11, 2026