Skip to content

2D vs. 3D Imaging in laparoscopic surgery

2D vs. 3D Imaging in laparoscopic surgery

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
DRKS
Registry ID
DRKS00005685
Enrollment
80
Registered
2014-02-05
Start date
2014-02-10
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-04-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

K35.8 K80.20

Interventions

Group 1: 2 D Imaging system
2D Endoeye laparoscopy camera Group 2: 3 D imaging system
3D Endoeye laparoscopy camera

Sponsors

Asklepios Klinik Langen
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to 80 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patients with informed consent and where the indication for a laparoscopic procedure is given

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Patient with dissent or unable to consent

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Comfort to the surgeon controlled by likert scale / visuell analog scale and raw NASA TLX questionnaire directly after the operation; duration of operation in minutes

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
adverse events, registered with the clavien dindo classification

Countries

Germany

Contacts

Public ContactAlexander Buia

Asklepios Klinik Langen, Klinik für Viszeral- und Thoraxchirurgie

a.buia@asklepios.com06103-912-1309

Outcome results

None listed

Source: DRKS (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026