K08.2
Conditions
Interventions
Group 1: Crossover Option A:
2 implants in regio 2 with EASY-CON attachments (regio 4 implants unloaded)
with high retention force
Group 2: Crossover Option B:
4 implants in regio 2 and regio 4 mit
Sponsors
Poliklinik für Zahnärztliche Prothetik
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Inclusion criteria
Inclusion criteria: poitiv consent statement; full age; edentulous lower jaw; adaquate bone in vertical and horizontal dimension; informed about alternative treatment options; the advantages and disadvantages as well as corresponding costs; decision against alternative treatment option;
Exclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria: A lack of consent, minority or limited legal capacity provide for the exclusion of patients from the study. There must be no change of location of the patient to be planned. Patients who suffer from bruxism (teeth grinding), pregnant and lactating women, and patients after Radatio in the jaw / face area, bisphosphonate therapy within the last ten years or bleeding diathesis are also excluded. Patients with inadequate bone, are also excluded from participation.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Chancge of masticatory efficacy (chewing test) on lower jaw prothesis retained with/without llocatorlike attachments on interforaminal diameter reduced implants after 3, 6, and 9 months post operative | — |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Test intervals: 3, 6, 9 and 12 months postoperative Quality of Life before and after implant insertion with option A and B (questionaire OHIP) Recording of functional change of stomatognathic by using EMG-Activity with option A and B Patients' Expectation (Questionaire) Prosthetic Complications (clinical examinsation) Survivalrate of diameter reduced implants (clinical examinsation) | — |
Countries
Germany
Contacts
Public ContactStefanie Kappel
Poliklinik für Zahnärztliche ProthetikUniversität Heidelberg
Outcome results
None listed