Comparison of a structured progressive task-oriented circuit Training with an individual face-to-face physiotherapy program regarding walking competency after stroke

Comparison of a structured progressive task-oriented circuit Training with an individual face-to-face physiotherapy program regarding walking competency after stroke - Fit-stroke

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Interventional

Source

DRKS

Registry ID

DRKS00005353

Enrollment

100

Registered

2013-11-18

Start date

2008-11-10

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2025-04-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

I63.3 I61.1 I63.4

Interventions

Group 1: progressive task-oriented 90 minutes of circuit Training in a Group Setting, 5 days a week, for 6 weeks Group 2: Task-oriented individually tailored 90 minutes of face-to-face physiotherapy

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

All

Age

18 Years to 75 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Patients aged 18-70 years old after having suffered their first stroke with a resulting hemiparesis. They must be able to walk 10 meters (with or without an aid) by themselves without falling. 2. the stroke has to be verified by CCT or MRI. 3.the patients have to be able to give informed consent and be motivated to participate in a 6 week intensive programme of physiotherapy. 4. Description of patients by lesion side, and ADL-competency with the Barthel Index and NIH Stroke Scale

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Patients were excluded 1. if they had cognitive deficits as evaluated by the mini-mental state examination (<24 points), were unable to communicate 2. had a multimodal neglect 3. had other neurologic disease (i.e. Parkinson Disease, multiple sclerosis) or 4. others affecting the musculosceletal System 5. Diabetes melitus with neurologic complications (polyneuropathy) 6. malignant Tumor 7. or participated in other studies

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Stroke Impact scale Version 3.0 , the mobility domain,a self reported scale including 9 questions, performed after 6 weeks of Training and after 24 weeks post inclusion in the study	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
Secondary outcomes include other domains of the stroke impact scale (version 3.0)related to activities and participation , the Rivermead mobility index (RMI), the falls efficacy scale (FES),the Nottingham extended activities of daily living (NEADL), the hospital anxiety and depression scale (HADS), and thefatigue severity scale (FSS). Other secondary outcomes were performance tests—namely, the Motricity index (MI-arm and MI-leg), functional ambulation categories, six minute walktest, five meter comfortable walking speed test. All assessments were measured 6 and 24 weeks after inclusion in the study.	—

Measure

Time frame

Secondary outcomes include other domains of the stroke impact scale (version 3.0)related to activities and participation , the Rivermead mobility index (RMI), the falls efficacy scale (FES),the Nottingham extended activities of daily living (NEADL), the hospital anxiety and depression scale (HADS), and thefatigue severity scale (FSS). Other secondary outcomes were performance tests—namely, the Motricity index (MI-arm and MI-leg), functional ambulation categories, six minute walktest, five meter comfortable walking speed test. All assessments were measured 6 and 24 weeks after inclusion in the study.

—

Countries

Germany

Contacts

Public ContactCaroline Renner

NRZ Leipzig-Bennewitz,Universität Leipzig

renner@sachsenklinik.de03425888195

Outcome results

None listed

Source: DRKS (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026