Skip to content

Convective vs. conductive patient warming - comparison of efficacy for preventing perioperative hypothermia in patients undergoing mininmal invasive thoracic surgery

Convective vs. conductive patient warming - comparison of efficacy for preventing perioperative hypothermia in patients undergoing mininmal invasive thoracic surgery

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
DRKS
Registry ID
DRKS00005091
Enrollment
60
Registered
2013-06-20
Start date
2013-05-28
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-04-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

T68

Interventions

Group 1: Controllgroup: convective warming with the Universal II blanket of Moeck&Moeck Group 2: Intervention group: conductive warming with the UniqueTemp Jelly system of Geratherm Medical AG

Sponsors

Zentrum für Anästhesiologie, Rettungs- und Intensivmedizin
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to 75 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: BMI 20-30 kg/m2; ASA I-III; duration of procedure 60-180 min

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: hypo-/hyperthyreosis; febril infection; pregnancy; epidural catheter; being allergic to used substances, e.g. propofol, remifentanil etc.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
• Number of patients with postoperative hypothermia (core body temperature < 36°C).

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
• Number of patients who become hypothermic intraoperatively (core body temperature <36°C) • Duration of hypothermia with core body temperature < 36°C • Length of stay in the PACU

Countries

Germany

Contacts

Public ContactAnselm Bräuer

Zentrum für Anästhesiologie, Rettungs- und Intensivmedizin

abraeue@gwdg.de+49 551 396051

Outcome results

None listed

Source: DRKS (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026