Skip to content

Personalised Prognostic Tools for Early Psychosis Management

Personalised Prognostic Tools for Early Psychosis Management - PRONIA

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
DRKS
Registry ID
DRKS00005042
Enrollment
1680
Registered
2013-10-07
Start date
2013-11-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-04-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Individuals in a clinically defined at-risk mental state for psychosis healthy volunteers F20 F22 F23 F25 F28 F29 F31.2 F32.3 F32

Interventions

Group 1: Observation group (naturalistic design) including ROP patients, ROD patients, individuals in an at-risk mental state for psychosis and healthy volunteers Examinations: In all subjects: - Blo

Sponsors

Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy Ludwig-Maximilian-University
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
15 Years to 40 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Recent-onset psychosis (ROP): • EITHER (i) transition criteria as defined by Yung et al. (1998) • OR (ii) ICD-10: F20.x, F22.x, F23.x, F25.x, F28, F29, F31.2, F32.3 Recent-onset depression (ROD): • ICD-10: F32.x At-risk mental states for psychosis (ARMS): • EITHER (i) CAARMS criteria • OR (ii) SPI-A criteria • OR (iii) GAF reduction = 30% and positive family history of psychoses • OR (iv) GAF reduction = 30% and criteria for schizotypia (ICD-10: F21) Controllgroup: • healthy volunteers without a personal history of affective or non-affective psychoses or other psychiatric conditions and no family history of psychoses (1° relatives)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: General exclusion: • Age 40 • IQ 12 months • Duration of antipsychotic medication > 3 months ROD: • Inclusion criteria for ROP and ARMS • Duration of depressive episode > 12 months ARMS: Inclusion criteria for recent-onset psychoses HC: • Personal history of affective or non-affective psychoses or other psychiatric conditions • Family history of psychoses (1° relatives)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Sensitivity and Specificity of prognostic system

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Individuals diagnostic load / cost effectiveness of prognostic system

Countries

Finland, Germany, Italy, Switzerland, United Kingdom

Contacts

Public ContactNikolaos Koutsouleris

Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy Ludwig-Maximilian-University

nikolaos.koutsouleris@med.uni-muenchen.de+49 89 5160 5885

Outcome results

None listed

Source: DRKS (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 14, 2026