Skip to content

The spinal anesthesia with hyperbaric Lokalanästhestikum performed in the lateral position, compared to general anesthesia in outpatient anesthesia, in terms of effectiveness, process times, hemodynamic stability, perioperative complications, and postoperative pain

The spinal anesthesia with hyperbaric Lokalanästhestikum performed in the lateral position, compared to general anesthesia in outpatient anesthesia, in terms of effectiveness, process times, hemodynamic stability, perioperative complications, and postoperative pain - ESG-unilaterSPA

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
DRKS
Registry ID
DRKS00004906
Enrollment
120
Registered
2013-04-30
Start date
2011-04-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

M23 M17

Interventions

Group 1: Anesthetic procedures: spinal anesthesia with hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.5% in lateral position: completely objective, sympathetic unilateral spinal anesthesia for ambulatory surgery on the kn

Sponsors

Universitätsmedizin Göttingen Zentrum Anästhesiologie, Rettungs- und Intensivmedizin
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to 80 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Be included in the study 120 male or female patients who undergo elective outpatient arthroscopy of the knee joint. This included 60 patients who received anesthesia as a unilateral spinal anesthesia and 60 patients receiving general anesthesia

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Unsuitability for the anesthetic procedure

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
1 Process times SPA vs. general an. - Time to implement the spinal anesthesia /general anesthesia., beginning OP - Time seam, recovery - Dismissal time recovery - Staff retention time recovery 2 Unilateral spinal anesthesia, by testing the sensory / motor blockade - Objective testing with measurement of sympatic activity by measuring the skin conductance (ESG-Electric sympatho graphy)

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
perioperative complications - anesthetic protocol postoperative pain - Questionnaire

Countries

Germany

Contacts

Public ContactIngo Bergmann

Universitätsmedizin Göttingen Zentrum Anästhesiologie, Rettungs- und Intensivmedizin

Ingo.Bergmann@med.uni-goettingen.de0551 / 3922995

Outcome results

None listed

Source: DRKS (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026