high-output stoma (> 2000 ml/day), ileus, stenosis, obstruction, prolapse, necrosis, retraction, fistulization, skin complications K43.9 Z93
Conditions
Interventions
Group 1: lateral pararectal stoma placement
Group 2: transrectal stoma placement
Sponsors
Medizinische Fakultät Mannheim, Universität Heidelberg
Universitätsmedizin Mannheim, Chirurgische Klinik
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Inclusion criteria
Inclusion criteria: • patient (age >18y) with indication for planned temporary loop ileostomy, i.e. patient with rectal cancer undergoing elective low anterior resection with placement of a temporary protective loop ileostomy • written informed consent
Exclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria: • emergency operations • ostomies which are not definitely planned to be taken down/permanent ostomies • age <18
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Primary endpoint is the incidence of parastomal hernias defined by any of the following events: a) clinically manifest parastomal hernia as any palpable bulge or defect that appears after removal of the appliance while the patient is erect or coughing (photodocumentation) b) sonographically diagnosed parastomal hernia (definition: protrusion of intraabdominal contents adjacent to the stoma) c) intraoperative finding when the ileostomy is taken down (questionnaire for the surgeon) Standardized approach to detect the primary endpoint: All patients are screened for parastomal hernia clinically and sonographically. The surgeon who performs the ileostomy take-down documents the intraoperative finding using a standardized questionnaire. The follow-up duration is about 3-6 months. This observation period corresponds to the time period between stoma placement and ileostomy takedown. | — |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Secondary endpoint(s): • Stoma-related morbidity (according to Clavien): high-output stoma (> 2000 ml/day), ileus, stenosis, obstruction, prolapse, necrosis, retraction, fistulization, skin complications Stratification into complications which can be managed in the ambulatory setting (clinic, outpatient wound therapy, outpatient stoma therapy) vs. complications which require hospitalisation and perhaps even surgical intervention/revision • appliance aspects (patient perspective) • Quality of Life (assessed by the EORTC questionnaires QLQ-CR29 and QLQ-C30) Quality of Life (QoL) is assessed twice using the two EORTC questionnaires: 1. during the screening visit (preoperative "baseline" quality of life) 2. during the follow-up visit 10 +/- 2 weeks after hospital discharge from UMM (postoperative QoL with stoma) | — |
Countries
Germany
Contacts
Public ContactJulia Hardt
Universitätsmedizin Mannheim, Chirurgische Klinik
Outcome results
None listed