Skip to content

Randomized, controlled clinical trial evaluating the efficacy and clinical effectiveness of negative pressure wound therapy for the treatment of diabetic foot wounds when compared to standard wound therapy A study project with a pragmatic approach to evaluate the negative pressure wound therapy in the medical treatment sectors in Germany

Randomized, controlled clinical trial evaluating the efficacy and clinical effectiveness of negative pressure wound therapy for the treatment of diabetic foot wounds when compared to standard wound therapy A study project with a pragmatic approach to evaluate the negative pressure wound therapy in the medical treatment sectors in Germany - DiaFu

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
DRKS
Registry ID
DRKS00003347
Enrollment
464
Registered
2011-11-22
Start date
2011-12-23
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-04-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Chronic diabetic foot wounds after debridement avital tissue components Chronic diabetic foot wounds after amputation below the articulatio talocruralis E10.74 E10.75 E11.74 E11.75

Interventions

Group 1: Negative Pressure Wound Therapy Group 2: Standard wound therapy according to current evidence-based guideline (basic and advanced methods of wound treatment)

Sponsors

Private Universität Witten / Herdecke gGmbH
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to No maximum

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Presence of diabetes mellitus; Presence of a foot wound (chronic wounds; amputational wounds) Wagner stage 2-4; Existence of the foot wound for at least 4 weeks; Signed informed consent form; Patient's eligibility of NPWT in the opinion of the treating physician

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Age <18 years; Pregnancy; Non-Compliance; Allergies regarding the release of substances from components of each treatment arm; Severe anemia, which was not caused by an infection; Simultaneous participation of patients in another interventional study / previous participation in the same study; Use of NPWT systems to the study-related foot lesion within a period of 6 weeks prior to study inclusio; Presence of necrotic tissue with eschar, which can not be removed; Untreated osteitis or osteomyelitis; Not examined / unexplored fistula; Malignancy of the wound; Exposed: nerves, blood vessels, anastomotic site; ambulant NPWT of patients receiving anticoagulants (especially heparinization or marcumar therapy) or with otherwise highly impaired clotting function, which have a risk of circulatory relevant bleeding

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Number of achieved and confirmed wound closures within a maximum treatment time of 16 weeks plus the time until complete wound closure (in days) The wound closure is defined as 100% epithelialization; no need for drainage, no need for supportive therapy or a means of assistance and absence of suture material. The closure must remain at least for a period of 14 days.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Time until optimal preparation of the wound bed for further therapy (granulation of at least 95%); Time to reach a complete wound closure within the observation period of 6 months; Recurrences; Amputations (appearance and dimension); Wound size over time; Proportion of wound tissue qualities over time; all SAEs within 6 months; wound specific and device specific AEs within the active study treatment time of 16 weeks or until end of therapy; Pain (NRS) within the active study treatment time of 16 weeks or until end of therapy; Quality of Life (EQ-5D) within 6 months; direct costs (medical and non-medical); indirect costs

Countries

Germany

Contacts

Public ContactDörthe Seidel

Institut für Forschung in der Operativen Medizin Private Universität Witten/Herdecke gGmbH

Doerthe.Seidel@uni-wh.de0049(0)2219895731

Outcome results

None listed

Source: DRKS (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Mar 19, 2026