Skip to content

GREAT - a randomised aneurysm trial

GREAT - a randomised aneurysm trial - GREAT

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
DRKS
Registry ID
DRKS00003132
Enrollment
500
Registered
2011-07-06
Start date
2009-10-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-10-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

I67.1

Interventions

Group 1: Endovascular coil embolisation with Hydrosoft coils Group 2: Endovascular coil embolisation with bare platinum coils

Sponsors

Klinik für Neuroradiologie Neurozentrum Universitätsklinikum Freiburg
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to 75 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Aneurysm from 4 – 12 mm in diameter • Anatomy such that endovascular occlusion is deemed possible (not necessarily probable) • The neurointerventionist is content to use either bare platinum or HydroSoft depending on randomisation result • The neurointerventionalist is content not to use any other type of coated coil • The patient has not been previously randomised into this trial • Aneurysm has not previously been treated (by coiling or clipping).

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: If the patient has more than one aneurysm requiring treatment at the same treatment episode they will not be eligible for the trial. If treatment will be staged in a patient with multiple aneurysms and only one aneurysm will be treated at one sitting then the patient is eligible. However, a patient may not be randomised into the study more than once. From the moment of randomisation, the patient is in the trial whether they receive trial treatment or not, and will be followed up and accounted for in the final analysis (intention-to-treat). Death or procedural/disease related morbidity may result in some subjects not having check angiography (or MRA if unit uses this as standard mode of follow-up). These patients will be counted as poor outcomes in the primary analysis. Retreatment of previously coiled or clipped aneurysm is an exclusion criterion. Use of coil assist devices (stent, balloon, trispan etc) should be recorded but is not an exclusion criterion. It must be recorded in order to ascertain if any difference in use between control & HydroCoil groups acts as a potential confounding variable.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Composite outcome of major aneurysm recurrence on follow-up angiography and clinical outcome within 18 months (Formulation of endpoint amended for clarification; primary endpoint combining angiographic outcomes [major recurrence], re-treatment, and clinical outcomes in the absence of angiographic follow-up was specified before the trial started)

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Packing density, Coil length deployed, Clinical outcome at 6 and 18 months post-coiling, as measured by modified Rankin scale

Countries

France, Germany

Contacts

Public ContactChristian Taschner

Klinik für Neuroradiologie Neurozentrum Universitätsklinikum Freiburg

christian.taschner@uniklinik-freiburg.de+49(0)761 270 50010

Outcome results

None listed

Source: DRKS (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Mar 18, 2026