Skip to content

Experienced involvement in counselling for prostate cancer

Experienced involvement in counselling for prostate cancer

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
DRKS
Registry ID
DRKS00000296
Enrollment
100
Registered
2010-01-05
Start date
2010-01-12
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-10-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

C61

Interventions

Group 1: Interventional arm: Additional psychosocial support by a former patient. Group 2: Control: Routine counselling without additional intervention.

Sponsors

Urologische Universitätsklinik Heidelberg
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
Male
Age
18 Years to 85 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Initial diagnosis of localized prostate cancer Counselling at the Department of Urology, University of Heidelberg Informed consent

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Missing informed consent Prostatectomy is not a valid treatment option Extension of surgery (e.g. cystectomy) Locally advanced disease (N+, R2-situation) or systemic disease (M1)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Subjective satisfaction with decision-making process and with the finally made decison - self-designed questionnaire

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Feasibility of the additional support program - documented interventions || Depression and self efficiency - PHQ-4 (Löwe, Wahl et al. in press); SWE (Schwarzer and Jerusalem 1995) || Objective and subjective coping parameters: degree of informedness, self-assessment of health, subjective quality of life, satisfaction with provided counselling, emotional distress, subjective judgement on objective symptoms - PCI (Schwarzer und Taubert 2002), Emotion thermometer (Mitchell, Baker-Glenn et al. 2009), SF 12 (Ware, Kosinski et al. 1996), ICS male (Bates, Wright et al. 1998) || Personality traits in intervention and control arm: preferences for decision making, self efficiency, need of social support, communication characteristics, social integration - SWE (Schwarzer and Jerusalem 1995), PCI (Schwarzer and Taubert 2002) || Quality of dyadic peer-to-peer support - self-designed questionnaire

Countries

Germany

Contacts

Public ContactDr. phil. Johannes Huber

Urologische Universitätsklinik Heidelberg

johannes.huber@med.uni-heidelberg.de+49(0)6221-56 6110

Outcome results

None listed

Source: DRKS (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026