Skip to content

Conservative treatment of fecal incontinence: Triple target treatment versus low frequent electrostimulation

Conservative treatment of fecal incontinence: Triple target treatment versus low frequent electrostimulation - 3T-FILES

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
DRKS
Registry ID
DRKS00000138
Enrollment
80
Registered
2009-05-25
Start date
2009-05-25
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-04-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Fecal incontinence, grade I and above R15

Interventions

Group 1: Contrain (Procon GmbH, 22393 Hamburg, Germany) will be used with rectal sitting electrode. The combination EMG biofeedback plus electrostimulation will be used. Patients will be treated with

Sponsors

Universitätsklinikum Gießen und Marburg GmbH Sitz Gießen
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to No maximum

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patients with fecal incontinence of any cause and at least grade I.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Patients with retention-overflow incontinence, rectal prolapse grade III, chronic inflammatory bowel diseases, will be excluded, as well as patients who are mentally or intellectually incapable of independent training. Further exclusion criteria are age under 18 years, and definite or possible pregnancy.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
The Primary endpoint is based on the Cleveland Clinic Score (CCS) in its validated German version. Primary endpoint is the difference of the CCS (continent 0, incontinent 20) between baseline and six month after randomization.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
In all cases, 3 and 6 months, respectively, after randomization, and 3 and 6 months after randomization compared with baseline. 1. Adapted Vaizey score. 2. Quality of life according to Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life Scale (FIQoL) [Rockwood et al. 1999]. 3. Success record. 4. Achievement of individual treatment goals. 5. Stool frequency. 6. Intake of stool-regulating medication. 6. Sub group by sphinkter damages yes/no. 7. Subgroups by neuropathies yes/no. 8. Harninkontinenz. 9. Manometrie. 10. BMI. 11. CCS after 3 months. 12. Stratification by centre.

Countries

Germany

Contacts

Public ContactThilo Schwandner

Klinik für Allgemein-, Viszeral-, Thorax-, Transplantations- und Kinderchirurgie

Thilo.Schwandner@chiru.med.uni-giessen.de+49 (641) 99-44200

Outcome results

None listed

Source: DRKS (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Mar 28, 2026