Skip to content

Robotic versus Laparoscopic Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer: A Propensity Score-Matched Retrospective Cohort Study

Robotic versus Laparoscopic Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer: A Propensity Score-Matched Retrospective Cohort Study

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ChiCTR
Registry ID
ChiCTR2600131011
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2026-08-27
Start date
2026-08-27
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-08-31

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Gastic cancer

Interventions

Sponsors

Peking University International Hospital
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Patients who underwent curative-intent gastrectomy, including distal, total, or proximal resection, at this institution between January 2015 and October 2025. 2. Histopathologically confirmed diagnosis of primary gastric adenocarcinoma (including signet-ring cell carcinoma), established either preoperatively or postoperatively. 3. Surgical procedure performed using one of the following minimally invasive approaches: robotic-assisted surgery (da Vinci Surgical System), conventional two-dimensional (2D) laparoscopy, or three-dimensional (3D) laparoscopy. 4. Tumor staging classified as AJCC/UICC TNM Stage I–III (8th edition). 5. Availability of complete inpatient medical records and comprehensive surgical documentation.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Emergency surgical intervention (e.g., for gastrointestinal perforation or obstructive massive hemorrhage) . 2. Palliative surgical procedures or diagnostic laparoscopy only. 3. Prior gastrectomy (including cases of remnant gastric cancer). 4. Concurrent malignancy (other than the index cancer under investigation). 5. Intraoperative conversion to open surgery (conversion rate reported separately but excluded from the primary efficacy and safety analyses). 6. Incomplete baseline or perioperative data (specifically, missing operative duration, number of retrieved lymph nodes, or postoperative length of hospital stay).

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Total number of retrieved lymph nodes;Incidence of Clavien-Dindo grade = II complications within 30 days after surgery;

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Time of operation;Intraoperative blood loss;Postoperative hospital stay;Number and positivity rate of positive lymph nodes;

Countries

China

Contacts

Public ContactNing Ning

Peking University International Hospital

NINGNING@pkuih.edu.cn+86 10 6900 6282

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ChiCTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Sep 19, 2026