Skip to content

Comparative Effects of Moderate-Intensity Exergaming and Intensity-Matched Cycle Ergometer Exercise on Immediate Executive Function in Sedentary College Students: An EEG-Based Study

Immediate Effects of somatosensory movement and equal-intensity power Cycling on executive Function: An EEG-based study

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ChiCTR
Registry ID
ChiCTR2600129618
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2026-08-07
Start date
2026-08-17
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-08-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Interventions

Exergaming-first sequence group:Exergaming first, followed by equal-intensity cycle ergometer exercise after a washout period of 7±2 days.
Cycle-ergometer-first sequence group:Equal-intensity cycle ergometer exercise first, followed by exergaming after a washout period of 7±2 days.

Sponsors

Guangzhou Sport University
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to 35 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Participants will be eligible for inclusion if they meet all of the following criteria: 1.Aged 18–35 years; 2.Currently enrolled as a full-time or part-time undergraduate, master’s student, or doctoral student at a regular institution of higher education; 3.Voluntarily agrees to participate, is able to understand the study procedures, potential risks, and participant rights, and provides written informed consent; 4.Able to wear an accelerometer continuously for seven days as required and provide valid data meeting the prespecified quality-control criteria; 5.Average sedentary time over seven days accounts for more than 50% of valid accelerometer wear time; 6.Deemed physically suitable for moderate-intensity exercise following exercise-safety screening; 7.Able to understand and complete the 2-back, Stroop, and WCST-like executive-function tasks; 8.Able to cooperate with and complete the two formal exercise-intervention sessions and the required pre- and post-exercise EEG assessments; 9.Agrees to comply with the prespecified requirements regarding sleep, exercise, alcohol consumption, and caffeine intake before both experimental sessions; 10.Able to maintain relatively stable daily routines and physical-activity habits during the study period.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Participants will be excluded if they meet any of the following criteria: 1.Invalid accelerometer data, insufficient valid wear days or valid wear time, or an average sedentary proportion of no more than 50% over seven days; 2.Cardiovascular, cerebrovascular, respiratory, metabolic, or other serious disease identified through interview or health screening that makes moderate-intensity exercise unsuitable; 3.Recent acute injury, significant musculoskeletal pain, joint instability, or another condition that interferes with exergaming or cycle ergometer exercise; 4.A history of epileptic seizures, unexplained syncope, or a neurological disorder that may substantially affect EEG acquisition or exercise safety; 5.A currently uncontrolled psychiatric or psychological disorder, or insufficient cognitive, language, or comprehension ability to complete the tasks; 6.Current use of medication that may substantially affect central nervous system function, heart-rate responses, or executive-function performance and is judged by the principal investigator to affect the study results or exercise safety; 7.Scalp injury, severe skin allergy, or another condition that makes wearing the EEG cap unsuitable; 8.Visual or corrected visual acuity insufficient to complete the computerized tasks, or a significant color-vision abnormality that interferes with completion of the Stroop task; 9.Unable to complete both experimental sessions at the scheduled times or explicitly unable to comply with the pre-experiment control requirements; 10.Concurrent participation in another interventional study that may affect physical activity, cognitive function, or EEG outcomes; 11.Considered unsuitable for participation by the principal investigator on safety grounds.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Mean reaction time for correct trials in the 2-back task;Accuracy in the 2-back task;Mean reaction time for correct trials in the congruent Stroop condition;Mean reaction time for correct trials in the incongruent Stroop condition;Accuracy in the congruent Stroop conditio;Accuracy in the incongruent Stroop condition;Stroop reaction-time interference effect;Stroop accuracy interference effect;Mean reaction time for correct rule-repeat trials in the WCST-like task;Mean reaction time for correct rule-switch trials in the WCST-like task;Accuracy for rule-repeat trials in the WCST-like task;Accuracy for rule-switch trials in the WCST-like task;Reaction-time switch cost in the WCST-like task;Accuracy switch cost in the WCST-like task;Number of categories completed in the WCST-like task;Rule-shifting-related measures in the WCST-like task;Mean N2 amplitude of task-related event-related potentials;Mean P3 amplitude of task-related event-related potentials;

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Peak latency of the task-related N2 component;Peak latency of the task-related P3 componentPeak latency of the task-related P3 component;Absolute theta-band power during resting-state EEG;Relative theta-band power during resting-state EEG;Absolute alpha-band power during resting-state EEG;Absolute beta-band power during resting-state EEG;Absolute beta-band power during resting-state EEG;Relative beta-band power during resting-state EEG;Frontal midline theta power;Alpha peak frequency;Difference in alpha power between eyes-open and eyes-closed resting states;Resting-state spectral power distribution across brain regions;

Countries

China

Contacts

Public ContactXiang Mingqiang

Guangzhou Sport University

xiangmq@gzsport.edu.cn+86 38024322

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ChiCTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Aug 25, 2026