Skip to content

Entecavir versus Tenofovir Alafenamide for Chronic Hepatitis B: An Efficacy and Cost-Effectiveness Analysis

Entecavir versus Tenofovir Alafenamide for Chronic Hepatitis B: An Efficacy and Cost-Effectiveness Analysis

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ChiCTR
Registry ID
ChiCTR2600128277
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2026-07-17
Start date
2026-07-20
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-07-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Chronic Hepatitis B

Interventions

Sponsors

The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to No maximum

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1.Age greater than 18 years; 2.It complies with the relevant diagnostic criteria in the "Guidelines for the Prevention and Treatment of Chronic Hepatitis B (2022 Edition)" formulated by the Hepatology Branch of the Chinese Medical Association and the Infectious Diseases Branch of the Chinese Medical Association; 3.All the patients were positive for HBsAg, positive or negative for HBeAg, and positive for HBV-DNA; 4.Take ETV or TAF for 48 weeks; 5.There are systematic examination results to determine the therapeutic effect of the drug;

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1.Patients with combined AIDS, viral hepatitis C, tuberculosis; 2.Pregnant or lactating women; 3.Combined HIV infection; 4.Previously received treatment with other anti-HBV infection drugs or immunomodulatory drugs;

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
HBV-DNA negative conversion rate;

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
ALT negative conversion rate;HBeAg negative conversion rate;

Countries

China

Contacts

Public ContactZiye Zhou

The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University

redd88@163.com+86 577 55559593

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ChiCTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Jul 23, 2026