Skip to content

Construction and Preliminary Clinical Validation of an AI Perception System for Anatomical Structures in Minimally Invasive Kidney Surgery: A Multicenter, Retrospective-Prospective, Observational Study

Construction and Preliminary Clinical Validation of an AI Perception System for Anatomical Structures in Minimally Invasive Kidney Surgery: A Multicenter, Retrospective-Prospective, Observational Study

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ChiCTR
Registry ID
ChiCTR2600128045
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2026-07-13
Start date
2026-06-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-07-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Renal mass, benign/malignant

Interventions

Single-arm observation group:None

Sponsors

Chinese PLA General Hospital
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to No maximum

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Age >= 18 years; 2. Undergoing minimally invasive renal surgery at a participating center, including partial nephrectomy, radical nephrectomy, radical nephroureterectomy, inferior vena cava tumor thrombus/cancer thrombus thrombectomy, pyeloplasty, or other related procedures; 3. Availability of intraoperative video recordings suitable for research, with video quality generally sufficient for anatomical identification; 4. Relatively complete perioperative clinical data, sufficient to support the recording of baseline case characteristics and study outcomes; 5. For the prospective validation phase: cases must meet the requirements for consecutive enrollment and comply with the ethical requirements of each participating center regarding informed consent or waiver of informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Emergency or critically ill cases requiring immediate surgery and deemed unsuitable for inclusion in the study workflow; 2. Video recordings or medical records that cannot be effectively de-identified; 3. Severe video incompleteness, missing key surgical phases, or excessively low resolution that precludes valid analysis; 4. Explicit refusal during the study period to allow the use of their data for research purposes; 5. Other conditions that, in the investigator’s judgment, make the case unsuitable for inclusion in the study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Dice coefficient;Intersection over Union, IoU;Precision;Recall;F1 score;Mean inference latency;Processing frame rate, FPS;System crash rate;Case coverage rate;Successful real-time display rate;

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Class-level performance for each anatomical category;Stratified performance across different surgical procedures;Improvement in anatomical awareness;Likert scale score;NASA-TLX score;Accuracy in human–AI comparison;Sensitivity in human–AI comparison;Specificity in human–AI comparison;Mean annotation time in human–AI comparison;

Countries

China

Contacts

Public ContactXin Ma

Chinese PLA General Hospital

mxin301@126.com+86 158 1136 6090

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ChiCTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Jul 23, 2026