Skip to content

A Comparative Study of Robotic Bronchoscopy and Percutaneous Ablation for Pulmonary Nodules

Robotic-assisted Bronchoscopy versus Percutaneous Ablation for Pulmonary Nodules

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ChiCTR
Registry ID
ChiCTR2600127243
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2026-06-27
Start date
2026-07-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-06-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Early-stage pulmonary nodules (including pulmonary ground-glass nodules, small pulmonary nodules), early malignant pulmonary nodules/preneoplastic lesions undergoing minimally invasive ablation therapy

Interventions

Percutaneous Ablation Group:CT-guided percutaneous ablation therapy
Robotic Bronchoscopic Ablation Group:Robotic-assisted bronchoscopic ablation therapy

Sponsors

The Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to No maximum

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1.Age older than 18 years; 2.Primary peripheral lung cancer diagnosed by pathology and pre-procedure staging examination suggesting clinical stage T1N0M0, stage IA (including postoperative new and multiple primary); 3.The target lesion was evaluated to be feasible for both CT and bronchoscopy-guided ablation; 4.Patients who are not suitable for surgery or refuse surgery, agree to undergo initial ablation therapy and sign informed consent form.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1.Patients with platelets 38.5°C; 4.Patients with severe hepatic, renal, cardiac, pulmonary and cerebral insufficiency, severe anaemia, dehydration and serious disorders of nutritional metabolism that cannot be corrected or improved in a short term; 5.Those with poorly controlled malignant pleural effusions; 6.Anticoagulation therapy and/or anti-platelet drugs (except dabigatran, rivaroxaban and other new oral anticoagulants) have not been discontinued more than 5~7d before ablation; 7.Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) score > 2; 8.Combination with other tumors with extensive metastases and an expected survival of <6 months; 9.Patients with episodic psychosis; 10.Pregnant women, or patients with pregnancy plan during the study period; 11.Have participated or are participating in other clinical studies within 30 days; 12.Any other condition that the investigator considers inappropriate for participation in this study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
12-month Complete Ablation Rate;

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Needle Placement Accuracy;Postoperative Hospital Stay;Quality of Life Score (SF-36/EQ-5D);Complication Rate;12-month Local Control Rate;Procedure Duration;

Countries

China

Contacts

Public ContactHao Zhang

The Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University

haozhang_xz@163.com+86 516 85806310

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ChiCTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Jul 3, 2026