Skip to content

A Retrospective Cohort Study on the Impact of Painless Oocyte Retrieval Versus Non-Anesthetic Oocyte Retrieval on Assisted Reproductive Outcomes

A Retrospective Cohort Study on the Impact of Painless Oocyte Retrieval Versus Non-Anesthetic Oocyte Retrieval on Assisted Reproductive Outcomes

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ChiCTR
Registry ID
ChiCTR2600126899
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2026-06-18
Start date
2026-07-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-06-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

female infertility

Interventions

Painless oocyte retrieval group:None
Non-anesthetic oocyte retrieval group:None

Sponsors

The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
Female
Age
18 Years to 45 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Age between 18 and 45 years; 2.Underwent transvaginal ultrasound-guided oocyte retrieval at our center; 3.The analgesia/anesthesia method on the day of oocyte retrieval was clearly documented and could be classified as either the painless oocyte retrieval group or the non-anesthetic oocyte retrieval group; 4.Availability of complete or substantially complete follow-up data, including oocyte retrieval data, oocyte quality assessment, embryo development assessment, and clinical pregnancy outcomes; 5.Patient clinical data could be retrieved through the hospital electronic medical record system, reproductive medicine database, surgical anesthesia system, and other relevant sources.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Incomplete data or missing key variables: inability to determine the analgesia/anesthesia method used during oocyte retrieval;missing key outcome data, including the number of oocytes retrieved, oocyte quality, embryo development data, clinical pregnancy outcomes, etc.or inability to retrieve records from the electronic medical record system, anesthesia records, or reproductive medicine database; 2. Severe complications affecting outcomes: occurrence of serious intraoperative complications during oocyte retrieval, such as failed ovarian puncture or major intraoperative bleeding; 3. Use of non-standard anesthesia/analgesia protocols during oocyte retrieval, making it difficult to classify patients into either the painless oocyte retrieval group or the non-anesthetic oocyte retrieval group.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Incidence of neonatal or embryo adverse events;

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
oocyte retrieval rate;Abnormal rate of neonatal disease screening;Type of embryo transfer;Available blastocyst number;retrieved oocyte number;abortion ratio;The number and rate of embryo cleavage;The rate of MII oocyte;The number and rate of Normal fertilization;oocyte morphology;premature delivery rate;clinical pregnancy rate;birth weight;ongoing pregnancy rate;biochemical pregnancy rate;the rate of neonatal congenital malformation;The number and rate of high-quality embryos;The number of MII oocyte;The number and rate of blastulation;

Countries

China

Contacts

Public ContactRen Li

The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University

renli177@163.com+86 23 8901 1069

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ChiCTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Jun 29, 2026