Skip to content

Evaluation of the Auxiliary Value of External Cannula for Clearing Gastric Retention During Endoscopic Ultrasound in Patients with Gastric Outlet Obstruction: A Single-Arm Study

Evaluation of the Auxiliary Value of External Cannula for Clearing Gastric Retention During Endoscopic Ultrasound in Patients with Gastric Outlet Obstruction: A Single-Arm Study

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ChiCTR
Registry ID
ChiCTR2600126717
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2026-06-15
Start date
2026-06-30
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-06-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

gastric outlet obstruction

Interventions

Intervention group:Clearance of gastric retention using an overtube-assisted device

Sponsors

West China Hospital, Sichuan University
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Patients with gastric outlet obstruction (GOO) caused by various factors; preoperative routine endoscopy is scored based on intragastric visibility, and inadequate gastric preparation is defined as an intragastric visibility score of =3. The gastric visibility scoring criteria are as follows: Preparation quality: Adequate Score 0 Endoscopic findings: The entire mucosa is clearly visible, with no residual fluid. Score 1 Endoscopic findings: Clear residual fluid is present. Score 2 Endoscopic findings: Visibility is reduced in 50% of the assessed area due to retained turbid fluid, mucus, bubbles, food residue, or other materials. Score 5 Endoscopic findings: Visibility is reduced in most of the assessed area (>75%) due to retained turbid fluid, mucus, bubbles, food residue, or other materials. Score 6 Endoscopic findings: Gastric distension caused by a large amount of retained food residue, mucus, and turbid fluid. 2. Patients requiring the completion of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) diagnosis and treatment; 3. Patients who have signed the clinical study informed consent form.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Inability to insert the suction tube due to altered anatomical conditions; 2. Patients unable to tolerate surgery due to concurrent severe coagulation disorders, severe cardiopulmonary disease, or poor general condition; 3. Patients with suspected gastrointestinal perforation; 4. Patients who are uncooperative due to mental illness or severe intellectual disability; 5. Refusal of the patient or their legal guardians to participate in the study; 6. Study participants who have already been enrolled in other clinical studies.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Improvement in Patients' White-Light Endoscopy and EUS Visibility;

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Adequate clearance rate;Clearance time;Technical success rate of EUS;Image Quality of WLE and EUS;Lesion detection rate;Technical success rate of EUS-FNA;Technical success rate of interventional procedures;Incidence of adverse events;Length of hospital stay;

Countries

China

Contacts

Public ContactWang Rui

West China Hospital, Sichuan University

wangruifisher@163.com+86 189 8060 6860

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ChiCTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Jun 29, 2026