Skip to content

Comparison of the efficacy of minimally invasive palatal suture incision with piezosurgery and MARPE in the treatment of adult maxillary transverse deficiency

Comparison of the efficacy of minimally invasive palatal suture incision with piezosurgery and MARPE in the treatment of adult maxillary transverse deficiency

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ChiCTR
Registry ID
ChiCTR2600126128
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2026-06-04
Start date
2026-07-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-06-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

maxillary transverse deficiency

Interventions

Sponsors

Shanghai Stomatological Hospital, Fudan University
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to 45 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Retrospective part: (1) Patients aged 18-45 years, of any gender; (2) Have undergone minimally invasive surgery or MARME-assisted maxillary skeletal expansion; (3) Have CBCT images before treatment and at the end of treatment. 2. Prospective part: (1) Patients aged 18-45 years, of any gender; (2) Narrow maxillary dental arch, with treatment plan involving maxillary skeletal expansion; (3) CBCT shows palatal suture has fused and calcified, maturity assessed as stage D or E; (4) Bilateral maxillary first premolars and first molars are intact with no large defects, and periodontal condition is good, suitable for bonding expansion devices; (5) Signed informed consent and committed to complete follow-up.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Retrospective part: (1) History of maxillofacial trauma or orthognathic surgery; (2) Patients with pathological damage to the jawbone, fractures or large defects in the hard palate area, or cleft lip and palate; (3) CBCT images of poor quality, making accurate measurement impossible. 2. Prospective part: (1) History of maxillofacial trauma or orthognathic surgery; (2) Patients with pathological damage to the jawbone, fractures or large defects in the hard palate area, or cleft lip and palate; (3) Patients with moderate to severe inflammation; thin buccal bone of the posterior maxillary teeth; roots of the maxillary central incisors (teeth 11-21) in close contact; (4) Patients with limited mouth opening and severe temporomandibular joint disorders; (5) Patients with metal allergies; (6) Pregnant or breastfeeding patients; (7) Patients with psychological disorders such as depression or anxiety; (8) Patients with other surgical contraindications.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
The increase in the width of the maxillary basal bone relative to the baseline after arch expansion;

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Inclination angle of the first molar;nasal width;Patient's subjective evaluation;

Countries

China

Contacts

Public ContactLiming Yu

Shanghai Stomatological Hospital

ylmphoebe@126.com+86 21 5466 8034

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ChiCTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Jun 11, 2026