Skip to content

Comparison of Two Non-graft Maxillary Sinus Lift Techniques for Implants in Low Residual Bone Height

Comparison of Clinical Efficacy between a New Non-graft Sinus Lift Technique for RBH 2-4mm and the Conventional Osteotome Non-graft Sinus Lift Technique for RBH 4-6mm

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ChiCTR
Registry ID
ChiCTR2600125206
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2026-05-22
Start date
2026-06-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-05-25

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Tooth loss in the maxillary sinus area with low residual alveolar bone height

Interventions

2–4 mm bone chisel group:None
2–4 mm new technology group:None
4-6 mm bone chisel group:None

Sponsors

Stomatology Hospital,Zhejiang University School Medicine
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to No maximum

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Age >= 18 years old; 2. Simultaneous implant placement during sinus floor elevation without bone grafting in the maxilla; 3. Preoperative CBCT measurement of residual bone height (RBH): 2-4mm and treated with new techniques or bone chisel method, or 4-6mm and treated with bone chisel method; 4. Complete clinical and radiological data, with a follow-up period of >= 1 year; 5. Informed consent obtained from the patient and compliance with ethical requirements.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Comorbid uncontrolled systemic diseases (such as diabetes, malignant tumors, etc.); 2. Use of antibiotics or receipt of head and neck radiotherapy and chemotherapy within 3 months preoperatively; 3. Presence of mental illness, alcoholism, or smoking more than 10 cigarettes per day; 4. Secondary surgery following implant failure; 5. Presence of maxillary sinusitis, mediastinal conditions, or severe anatomical abnormalities.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
One-year postoperative implant survival rate;Bone gain;Osseointegration rate;

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Implant stability (ISQ value);Incidence of complications;Surgical duration;

Countries

China

Contacts

Public ContactMao Yingjie

Stomatology Hospital,Zhejiang University School Medicine

myj0571@zju.edu.cn+86 571 87211819

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ChiCTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: May 30, 2026